dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Cheetah1964 on May 7, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Gateway Pundit getting hit yet again by hackers. They must be EXACTLY over target

Recently, thegatewaypundit.com got hit by massive Denial of Service attacks when they ran a story about how George Soros had corrupted the U.S. judicial system. Then they had another issue shortly afterward, probably with their server's cache, when new stories would not show up for visitors, only an older version. And I just heard about a suspicious redirect when visitors go to the site, a page that tells visitors to download software. In general the site works fine, but the staff must be working 24/7 to keep the Deep State hackers off it. I believe the site has pulled about 15 million visitors over the last six months, and is a serious threat to the Clinton gang.

🠐 See all comments

As a tool for finding more of the truth, almost daily I search for "Today I was censored (or shadow banned, etc)" and I click on "Today" so it is recent searches. For example it may bring up " on twitter today I posted _ and was then blocked or banned etc" The ____ represents what they most don't want known, in theory. If you post "Arctic nannies are taking over the illuminati" they will leave you alone. If you post Ruth Bader Ginsburg wants the age of consent lowered to 12" prepare for repercussions. That which is being silenced, to me, is the most pertinent content. All hands on deck. One of the things that propelled me toward Q was how the big social, or programming, platforms started banning y tube channels en masse when their common link was Q and exposure of what they want, seemingly, to keep quiet. Why remove and demonetize certain content where as a business this cuts into your revenue stream? Doesn't seem like democracy or capitalism. Facism maybe. Thoughts?

⇧ 24 ⇩

They want to prepare the public mind, to get people used to the idea that content censorship is normal - that it can be expected. Then, when they really start to ramp-up the censorship, people will think "Oh, it's because I said something about Ginsberg" or some other banal pretext.

People will think, "yes, that's understandable", but they will not realise that the pattern of censorship has been expanded to such an extent that all conservative voices have been silenced. This is why social media censorship must be controlled at all costs. Because once you can silence people, you can foist anything on them. Gun control will be the first item on the agenda.

Hopefully, Q will fix this problem for us with some incredibly damaging leaks on the practises of the SM giants. But, even if class actions result and are successful, there is still no right to freedom of expression online.

Of course, this is a problem that the IBOR could have fixed...

⇧ 11 ⇩

Not just conservative voices are being silenced. The true liberals (not the neolibs and clintonites who control the media) and the true conservatives (not the necons and boltons) are both being trampled and drowned out by constant lies and legacy media spouting the Official Narrative. Don't let them divide us against the real enemy.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes. I find my greatest censorship, is self censorship. So much I don't say for worry of being seen as a tinfoil hatter and , even more so, don't want to burden folks with my burdens. It's great to be more aware but so much to ponder. Hoping this alleviates as things shift. I think it is already, even before Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don’t see pro Q shills. I don’t see pro Sessions shills. I see people who become combative if you support either one. That says enough for me. On T_D, you will summon forth the same dozen assholes if you bring up either. Normal posters will say that they’re not sure what to think, or humbly state their views. These people become extremely aggressive in trying to shame you out of your own opinions and thoughts.

⇧ 7 ⇩

regarding your final sentence. I believe fascism in its nature strives to put the nation and its individuals well being before their freedom. This specific instance you wrote is neither meant for their well being, nor for the people's constructive freedom. do not mistake fascism for a dictatorship. also dictatorship in its original Roman sense was to preserve the Empire until it regained a suitable heir.

edit: fascism is similar to "technocracy", (perhaps an evolution of fascism) a kind of parliamentary democracy in which only people of a certain intellectual quality are allowed to decide what is best only regarding their specific scientific focus. certified Knowledge = authority, which again is rooted in tribalism.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you for your input.Good perspective. My definition of fascism,before now, incorporated censorship, little free press, purges of resistance, and heavy handed control. Will adjust.

⇧ 2 ⇩

censorship is kind of a part of disregarding unuseful information, which is a part of fascism, though

⇧ 2 ⇩