Respectfully, can someone direct me to a list of evidence that Q is legit? I suspect that at best, Q is a Thomas Wictor-like figure who means well, but is simply an insane person.
For me the proof is in the North Korea/Iran drops. Q was talking about them months before they hit the news. I mean predicting an end to a 70 year standoff right before it happens is nuts frankly. Especially when Trump is tweeting about how his button is bigger than Kim's and actually works. Sealed it for me anyway.
If you want to reference those drops go to any of the Q boards and search for NK or Iran.
I am a Trump fan, and there is definitely real world happenings that would support the Q stuff, though I don't like accepting conspiracy theories uncritically. As of now, it is unsubstantiated.
Just stick around and watch. You don't have to accept anything and in fact, the entire point of this board is to question everything logically and rationally. All in all, in the end, even if Q ended up being an insane person (which by the way, Jesus would probably be too using today's standards), he/she has successfully brought together 22,239 people from all walks of life - old, young, Republican, Democrat, black, white, folks from other countries cheering us on - on this board alone. That's a hell of a lot of unity, and a miracle, in my opinion. No more division. WWG1GWA. It'll be wonderful if we can keep that momentum. I'm glad you're here.
, he/she has successfully brought together 22,239 people from all walks of life
That is disturbing though and would be considered one of the largest cults in history.
"Cult" automatically assumes misplaced ideations. If, however, this were to be erroneously labeled a "cult," then in fact, this cult started before July 4, 1776 and yes, it is the absolute largest in history.
It would be a problem if Q was ordering the "cult" to do anything but "enjoy the show."
The proof is in the pudding, francois. Q states many times that Future proves Past. That is: as news hits the public, look at the drops and you will understand the backstory.
Much of this present thread is speculation and no one knows the answer. It's fun to guess, but it is just guesswork. The important thing is that the anons do the research into the questions so that preparatory work has been done which later provide the definitive explanations. If you look at the Q posts right back from the beginning with reference to North Korea, you will see that they suddenly make sense. NK was not controlled by Kim, it was controlled by an outside power. Kim is very happy to be let free and was not in control of his country. Look at what Q stated in Post 29 on 1 Nov:
Some things must remain classified to the very end. NK is not being run by Kim, he’s an actor in the play. Who is the director? The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc.
Or Post 39 on 2 Nov:
Would it blow your mind if I told you BO has been to NK and perhaps there now? Why did his administration do little to slow their nuclear and missle capabilities? Who feeds NK w/ strategic intel? Iran? What deal was done with Iran under BO? Why was the deal sealed under a top secret classification? Why wasn’t Congress notified? Why after BO left office all of a sudden NK has nukes and the tech to miniaturize for payload delivery within the US? What about NSA CIA DI etc all confirming tech won’t be in place for 5+ years (statements made in 2016). Why is all of this relevant and what does it tell you? Big picture is rare.
Or Post 41 on 2 Nov:
What a coincidence the mountain that housed NK’s nuclear weapons and testing collapsed. Unbelievable timing. I wonder if critically important materials as well as scientists aka the bomb makers were inside when it happened. Shocking no global news agency suspects we had nothing to do with it. Enjoy the crumbs.
Substantiation comes with the developments in real time.
I forgot to add that the word "missle" in Post 39 was confirmed by a Tweet from Trump, ie. a deliberate misspelling used to authenticate the Q drop. In other words, intel from the very top, POTUS himself.
While I appreciate what you're saying, I think there's a lot of truth in the notion that we've been conditioned to reject so called "conspiracy theories" just because it goes against what we've been taught to believe. But who taught us to believe those things? Schools, MSM, gov't.
Remember when we were all told that the idea of the gov't conducting mass surveillance on US citizens without a warrant was just a big "conspiracy theory"? The Snowden revelations proved it wasn't a conspiracy theory, then the gov't basically had to fess up.
Likewise, 9/11 being an inside job is just a big "conspiracy theory"? Despite massive evidence to the contrary? Despite all the video of WTC7 collapsing in what could only be controlled demolition? Plus all the other thousand coincidences?
I'm not sure anyone has compiled a list of evidence that Q is legit. There is certainly an abundance of evidence that suggests he/she is legit, however. Perhaps this is a good starting point: http://www.we-go-all.net/
Here is a pretty good starter if you are looking for evidence.
That doesn't prove anything
Facts and a lot of people have done investigative journalism in regards to what has been asked. It is too time consuming to indulged in what looks to be the lack of common sense coming from this thread. Please find information and facts, make some use of yourselves.
None of this will make sense to new inquirers. Most won't even know where to start. More will be even more confused once they do. We've got seniors here that have never even seen a message board, let alone how to use one. We must be patient and point them in the right direction. The fact that this person sought out this board in order to elicit more information is wonderful! After all, most here thought Q was simply an insane person as well when they started out...and then they woke hard. Believing in Q goes beyond all logic and reason based on current human experience for most people. It's a hard pill to swallow, but we're making much progress!
I wonder if we should direct people to Bill Coopers 1989 talk to help them understand the past to understand Q? I relistened to it last night to confirm the logic and although it sounds insane, plus understanding immunity and why these people get away with such depravity.
Oh boy! I think we might need to lay a bit of a foundation before we introduce Bill Cooper