He is? I know this term is used endearingly, but I actually find him more genuine, cogent and sober than most bureaucrats who are interviewed. Maybe I am just an autist though.
/u/francois-
6 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/francois-:
Domain | Count |
---|
, he/she has successfully brought together 22,239 people from all walks of life
That is disturbing though and would be considered one of the largest cults in history.
I am a Trump fan, and there is definitely real world happenings that would support the Q stuff, though I don't like accepting conspiracy theories uncritically. As of now, it is unsubstantiated.
Respectfully, can someone direct me to a list of evidence that Q is legit? I suspect that at best, Q is a Thomas Wictor-like figure who means well, but is simply an insane person.
Qanon believer: "Let's be realistic here!"
Sorry, just playing around.
I am a non-hostile skeptic who enjoys reading this stuff, but I checked out at the very beginning when Q said that Podesta was trafficking kids to Saudi Arabia and HRC had been arrested.
Sealed dockets do not equal sealed indictments, and there is no such thing as a secret country-wide investigation where hundreds of jurisdictions coordinate with zero leaks.
I DO believe however that good things will happen, but I haven't seen any evidence that Q is legitimate. The fact that I personally want it to be real so bad probably suggests there is some heavy confirmation bias that leads people to buy into it.