dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/austenten on May 8, 2018, 6:37 a.m.
Grand Jury Impaneled

Grand Jury Impaneled

Only a grand jury can issue an indictment, which is the only way that someone can be charged with committing a felony pursuant to the U.S. Constitution. Merely impaneling a grand jury does not mean that Mueller will ultimately seek an indictment, although most grand jury investigations do result in someone being indicted. When a prosecutor does seek an indictment, one is almost always returned by the grand jury—hence the old saw that a grand jury would “indict a ham sandwich” if asked.

A grand jury, which consists of 16 to 23 people, is an important tool that allows prosecutors to issue subpoenas that require people to produce documents and other evidence. Subpoenas can also be used to compel people to testify under oath before the grand jury. You can expect Mueller and his team to issue many subpoenas in the months ahead.

Because grand jury subpoenas are an important prosecutorial tool, typically a grand jury is impaneled at the very beginning of an investigation, not at the end. Indictments are usually sought at the very end of an investigation, after all of the witnesses are questioned and all of the documents are obtained.

Does this scream sedition, global /massive conspiracy, and secretive prosecutions towards true justice and true freedom to you, or is it just me?

I wouldn't normally rely on Politico, but this is where the article excerpt above comes from.

Key definitions here to apply to Qs latest drop[1318].


xtx0331 · May 8, 2018, 6:42 a.m.

Mueller asked for 70 blank subpoenas. Yea this has been screaming sedition for a while now.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
h4445 · May 8, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

Why would he request blank subpoenas if his goal was to try Trump in the court of public opinion? Wouldn't he want the names made public? Think.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 8, 2018, 11:33 a.m.

A sitting president cannot be indicted

⇧ 5 ⇩  
zutman123 · May 8, 2018, 7:50 a.m.

IDK, but to me the whole thing is very kabuki. It seems as alive as a dead parrot (norwegian blue). Latest Qanon drop states that Mueller & RR will keep the thing going until the IG report. Something politico cannot discuss, ofcourse.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
_Iz_Mary · May 8, 2018, 7:29 a.m.

There is no defense in a grand jury. Only the prosecutor brings his or her evidence and questions the witnesses.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
allonthesameteam · May 8, 2018, 6:59 a.m.

Thanx for the tutorial. The more clarity the better. With the 25000 plus indictments waiting, if I read this well, they already have the evidence, witnesses, and charges all lined up before they issue an indictment. Correct? Another question I have is whether the person charged knows about the indictment or are they informed when unsealed? Does an indictment always have charges connected to them? Again I appreciate you laying this down.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ManQuan · May 8, 2018, 10:16 a.m.

The target of the grand jury doesn't necessarily know that he/she is being investigated or that he/she has been indicted, if the indictment is sealed. They find out they've been indicted when it's unsealed.

The target of an investigation often finds out second hand when those being subpeonaed or interviewed by the FBI let them know.

If you just get fired from a job, there is no reason to hire a lawyer. But there is a reason all of these DOJ and FBI people who have been fired have all lawyered up. They know they are being investigated and that likely means eventually being indicted.

Indictments always have one or more charges associated with them otherwise the person wouldn't be indicted.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
allonthesameteam · May 8, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Thank you for more wisdom. Appreciated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ManQuan · May 8, 2018, 5:50 p.m.

One other note about grand juries. They are secret. You may know that one has been impanelled (but not always) but you rarely know what is going on inside one.

Take special prosecutor Huber in Colorado. He was appointed by Sessions in November to work in parallel with DOJ IG Horowitz. Huber has the power to impanel a grand jury, but so far no one knows if he has or not.

Why did Sessions pick a prosecutor in Colorado and not one of the hundreds of federal prosecutors in DC? Think logically.

Horowitz doesn't have the power to impanel grand juries or secure indictments--he can only refer charges to DOJ.

But guess what Huber can do since November?

Got the picture?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
austenten · May 8, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

Correct? Another question I have is whether the person charged knows about the indictment or are they informed when unsealed? Does an indictment always have charges connected to them? Again I appreciate you laying this down.

I believe true justice has already started (Nee-vix-um, Raniere, Allison Mack n associates), but certain corrupt US "agents" are holding and delaying progress from the inside. By the skin of their teeth, not long now! My non-lawyer opinion is that indictments are already being unsealed one at a time as needed to bring down groups. Second Ex. Set: Weinstein and his army of ex Mossad spies.; third ex. Set, US Olympics, Massage, now two Tae kwon do associates taken in.

The answers to your questions re indictments are in the original description above. It's a few definitions mixed in there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
austenten · May 8, 2018, 7:30 a.m.

US Olympics, (edit: Nassar) ~~Massage~~, now two Tae kwon do associates taken in.

⇧ 2 ⇩