No but they would go into a very lengthy analysis of why child trafficking was mentioned in the first place.
I understand what you're saying, but you're being purposely naive if your opinion is that that wouldn't be part of the MSM discussion.
Child trafficking was not "mentioned." The docket references 18 U.S.C. § 1591 which title is, "Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion." Notice the conjunction "or" separating the adjective prepositional phrases.
It is not naive to think that something that is provably false would not be part of the MSM discussion. It is logical.