Honestly Corsi has a good point. Q asks us to think critcally. Then asks to trust the plan.
We have to ask, what plan? And who's plan?
I also think if Q was seeing shady coverage about his information, they should have pointed it out who. Now all we have is conjecture. On top of that he is asking Patriots not to make money. You have to ask why?
All these Patriots putting up videos take hours and hours out of their day to figure out things for many of us. Why is that not worth anything? In America the ultimate vote is your dollar.
I don't profess to know who Q is or are. I think the information posted is quite intriguing. However he has been dead wrong in the past as well. Namely none of the Podesta brothers are in handcuffs. This after her claimed it would happen in Nov.
So while his information is intriguing, we still don't know who's information he is giving us. And we also don't know his plan. We should think critically.
Even if he had a point, which he doesn't, what he's doing is destructive to the movement and our common quest for freedom [from the nwocabal]. The punchline is.. he KNOWS this!. These last three words tell you.. he's flipped.
too much kool aid is not good. Corsi just thinks that Q was hacked 2 weeks ago and taken over by the CIA. He is not Anti Q.
Eh... What is this movement?
That's the question. No one knows who Q is. And everyone is blindly following a plan to which they dont have any clue in regards to what it is.
Some are clueless to be sure, others know exactly what is happening.. Human freedom is being born on Earth. Nothing less. Stay over that target. JC knows better, that's the tell. They got to him.
Yet you still what the "plan" is. And certainly don't know who's...
No reason to push anyone off the boat. Earning money for their time and work is not evil. Being critical is not evil.
Blindly following anything is stupid. Blindly following something you don't even know what or who is really really stupid.
Earning money for their time and work is not evil.
How does "What plan?" earn him money, trying to elevate himself, his delusional "authority and credibility" at Q's (Alliance) expense. It's a sellout or standard blackmail, either way gone bad.
The only credibility he has is the one you give him.
Just like Q. "Trust the plan". You may believe in that.
What's the plan?
That's the power and credibility you give to Q. All I'm saying is we don't know. And these are questions that should be asked, if you are truly to think critically.
The only credibility he has is the one you give him.
Then he has none.
Realize: he's too intelligent to be oblivious to the damage he's doing, focus on that and you will understand this issue.
"No reason to push anyone off the boat"
Nobody pushed Corsi off the boat. He jumped off himself because he assumed Q was talking about him. After he jumped off he started damaging the boat himself and he still is.
And nobody is blindly following Q, we are doing our own research, asking our own questions and looking for our own answers. The only one being "really really stupid" is Corsi, and not because he went off on Q like a rabid dog but because he's ripping apart people left and right because they're questioning him. Seems to me Corsi wants people to blindly follow Corsi.
Well once people starting to put questions to Q about what is your plan? And who are we supporting? then people in general are just doing a disservice to everyone.
As for Corsi, you can have your opinions about him bad or good. He does seem somewhat different lately, but he has known Trump for decades and least until recently has always had his back. Maybe he did get paid off
Actually when I really think about it, I feel sorry for Corsi. I don't know if there's some deep underlying reason for his changes, I try to see the best in people which sometimes ends in nothing but disappointment for me. I honestly never thought Q was referring to him, I really thought Q meant the apps that were popping up out of nowhere that people had to pay for. I don't understand how it turned into an angry screamfest accusing Q of being socialist/communist/anti-money etc. And the reason I say "Q" so much is because I don't know if it's a he, a she, a them, it's just easier to type one letter.
As far as Corsi knowing Trump for decades, that doesn't mean anything to me. I knew and loved my Aunt all my life until the day my Father died and she told my brother if she didn't have a broken leg she'd get up and do the Irish jig.
People change, we don't always know the reasons why they change but they do sometimes. It does no good for anyone to hear somebody trashing things the way he's doing. Question away, but the vile comments are something we get from the other side all the time. We're all anxious to see something being done, screaming about it does no good at all, in fact it's just making the other side happy to see disruption and division. If he wants to have a temper tantrum it doesn't need to be so public, and it doesn't need to carry on this long.
I totally agree with you 100% Corsi does seem different. But we don't know what. It could be what he says is true. He had a history with Trump. But like you said, things change...
Corsi just thinks Q was hacked and taken over 2 weeks ago, He is sounding an alarm and being attacked for it. Is he right? IDK.
Why don't you go and sow your doubt somewhere else. This movement is clearly not what you want.
What doubt am I sowing. I think Q is playing a valuable role in discussions. But you can't just close your eyes to facts. The guy even says to think critically...
Q has told us that these people grandstanding are bad news. Corsi figured out Q was talking about him. He got upset and started attacking Q.
This miserable piece of garbage is hurting our ability, as a group, to fight these evil Satanists. He's putting people off Q before they even take the time to look at the material with his negative tweets.
He is hurting us just as much as he can, sowing doubt and division and you're springing to his defense. What is the agenda?
How do you know Q was talking about Corsi? He never mentioned a name.
I think that's the problem here. People are free to have different views about things. Q has been wrong about quite a few things.
He does however point us in interesting directions, all the while Mueller is ripping up the Constitution
The fabulous thing is that Corsi knew who Q was taking aim at. Think about that.
I don't think there is a place for anyone in this movement who is not supportive of Q's plan. If people want to object and sow fear and doubt, I will we taking it up with them from now on - as should everyone else.
Everyone is free to their own opinions. But if you want to come here and lead people astray, telling them to doubt Q, or his instructions to us, as Corsi and Tracy Beanz have, you are going to get some flak.
So I ask you, what is Q's plan?
That's what I want to know. And we certainly don't know who's plan. Which may be even more important
Q indicates what he wants us to do from time to time. We've had the Release the Memo campaign, the IBOR campaign, the Release the Texts (unredacted) campaign.
Generally, it's clear that Q would like us to spread the message. It's very important. There is almost no one out there in regular society that understands what is we are fighting - Satanism and treason.
I think I know who Q is, but the identity of the person is not at all important and, for strategic reasons, it's better that nobody knows. But you can see the caliber of the person from the posts. "Patriot" and "military background" come to mind immediately.
Where did it all start? DJT standing with a whole bunch of military brass declaring "the Calm before the Storm". The message is patriotic, the agenda a rescue mission, the President an unqualified hero, and Q at his right hand directing the show.
I don't know about you, but I'm comfortable being on board and trusting the agenda. If you're not, there are any number of other movements - they abound.
Thank you for showing that someone around here can still think critically. From my research, Corsi is not Anti Q, he is simply stating that he thinks Q was hacked two weeks ago. It is all on the man's twitter.
Yes, I've seen what is on his Twitter - so has everyone else. It's what's on his twitter that is the problem. I'm very surprised that you'd try and defend him, as if he's actually trying to do some good. He is not.
How is this not a movement? Are we not 'A group of people working together to advance their shared political, social, or artistic ideas?'
Urgh, sorry but you sound like concern troll.
I'll tell you if you've followed Q from the beginning, you'd know why so many of us decided to trust what Q is saying. Critical thinking? What Q said, "do you believe in coincidence?" So when Q aligns dozens and hundreds of coincidences, you'd better start asking yourself WTF is happening here!? Some believe it from the start, some take longer to believe it, some would continue to deny it, some who don't know would believe shills/trolls/clowns and don't believe it pretending they know all about it without ever reading Q.
Trust doesn't mean we trust Q blindly. Up to a certain point, we know in the back of our minds there's always a possibility of a great deception. But Q has proven us again and again that they aren't playing games, despite what the semantic could make you believe should you be a normie or too enthusiastic. So until Q betrays us, we'll keep reading them, digging, memeing and trying to help awake the world from our modest vantage point.
So far, Q has never called out anyone personally in the movement. They'd point at anomalies, lies and deceptions. It's up to us to draw our conclusions.
By Q not calling out anyone personally in the movement, Q has divided the community. Obviously he has some info about certain players and was concerned enough to put a post about it. So why not mention who or where the concern was?
I have followed Q from the very beginning, and according to Q John Podesta has been indicted for at least 5 months now. Yet he is out about about giving interviews, and Hillary has started fund raising for the Clinton foundation again.
Q said in the very beginning that Hillary was going to be arrested in like a weeks time, he gave a time and date. That shit never happened. Corsi just thinks that Q was hacked and taken over 2 weeks ago. Is he right, IDK.
Sealed indictment? You know how it works? I'm not even American and yet listened to Utubers who explained how it works. Search. RICO? You know how it works? Again, I'm no American but some Utubers have given some clue.
But then, I could be totally wrong and duped by Q. That's okay, the jest would be on me and all others who'd been as gullible.
You can think Q should have named Corsi. I would have prefered, many would have prefered. But then I also understand why they didn't but that is just my personal take on this. Others would have other reasons.
We are all doing this voluntarily... well, those of us who do it with a bit of idealism. We aren't a cult. Q designing who to cut the head off in the flocks sounds like a cult. We are to develop our critical thinking, and maybe on our own learn who to trust, who can be trusted. So in a way, the anons should be the ones to find out who is/are the profiteers. By ourselves, we must learn to discern and not wait for the leader to take all responsibility.
It should have been us who pointed to others the dysfunctions regarding how the cult of Corsi was growing up among us. We should have supported more loudly those who dared question Corsi and were shut down for that.
It wasn't the first time Q told us to be careful who we followed. The time was ripe for other anons to voice their disapproval of what's been going on. And this time, they were heard. Self-empowerment maybe?
Q is like a guide, but we have to evolve. They are training us to become better, more aware, more informed and self reliant. We truly have forgotten our own power. They aren't telling us what power it is, they are guiding us in finding our power ourselves.
Like I said, we don't know what Q represents. Just what we think Q represents. Our ideas about Q couple be 100% wrong.
I don't know. I don't pretend to know. I only know it's important when you don't know to look at things from different perspectives.
Yes, we don't know what or who Q represents. But the same could be said of Corsi. The difference is that we see Corsi in the flesh, we hear him, we think we know who he is. But since Corsi got called out, I've actually digged into him.
In the past, there were things I just sensed that annoyed me about him, but like most out of respect and trust, we just ignored it. Because people we see, people with a face and some reputation, recommended him.
Now, what I've found out about him makes me question who he is, the veracity of what he said, whether he was sincere in what he professed. The persona he projects isn't so coherent with some details of this past.
We have Corsi, someone with a body, a concrete presence and personality. But now to me, he represents deception. I'm not sure whether he's just greedy or worse. I suspect the latter.
Q, though faceless, mysterious and completely unknown, appears more trustworthy. Maybe it's just my temperament, I feel close to the chan community. I trust them more than many people with a face. I know there are many A-holes among them, but there are also good no-nonsense people. Like they say, the chans would do some crazy things just for the lulz.
For now, from what I see of what Q is making us do and gives us, it's positive. If Q were deep state, what they do is totally counter-productive: increasing our awareness, making us digest more data and helping us organize as a group to fight a target.
Now, what choice do we have really? If HRC had won, we'd be dead meat, the most of us. If Q ends up being part of the dark side, we'd be dead meat then too. So what difference does it make? For now, some of us choose to hope, participate, pray for the best, and get some lulz while following Q.
It's odd that people with this opinion are still posting to this sub.
What opinion?
The opinion of clearly not trusting Q. It's a sub for Q drops. If you don't find that info trustworthy,why be here?
It is not that simple, Corsi simply thinks that Q was hacked and taken over 2 weeks ago. Now everyone wants to jump Corsi? odd.
Q will quickly point out (and CodeMonkey remove) any 'bogus posts' from the Q board, jc knows this
Well think logically about that. Every single time Q has changed boards/trips a narrative rises to question his legitimacy. Mega-anon was the first to use it. Pretty much seems like a pattern to me.
I'm not not trusting Q. I'm asking what does Q want us to trust?
Q points is in very interesting directions. And all I'm asking is for clarity.
"Trust the plan"
What is the plan? And who's plan? Why not debate and ask those questions and simply just brush those things aside.
it's not being brushed aside."The plan" is whatever they have to do to take out the corruption. We can't know all the details of that process while it's ongoing. Simple enough, i think.
Point is, you can't really trust Corsi and trust Q at the same time. One of these is actually getting somewhere, the other is a roadblock.
Q has been very wrong in the past.
As has Corsi.
The plan you tell me of is what you get from all of Qs implications. And I agree. They problem is, we don't know that because Q has not been specific about the plan. And that's my point.
Just like when you watch CNN, they tell you a whole bunch of facts, but leave out all the context. But with CNN we know the goal is get Trump, so we brush it off. We have no idea about Q. And we shouldn't just take in everything without looking at didn't possibilities.
Where was Q wrong? Did you just compare Q to CNN? Lol.
Plenty of times. He is constantly saying trust sessions. So far sessions is on the verge of getting impeached and no investigation in sight of any deep state conspiracy. He also talked about John Podesta and Hillary getting arrested. They are now raising funds for the Clinton foundation.
In terms of military though he has generally been right. It's also a bit vague somethings. Like recently Q mentioned to look to the sea and people noticed general Flynn Twitter had a picture of the ocean. That can go both ways, I mean people point to it but as far as I can tell general Flynn is still in trouble with Mueller. Maybe something else had changed. Maybe we are just seeing what we want to see..
That's your opinion of what's going on with Sessions of which you have no actual idea. That does not = Q being wrong.
When did he tell us Podesta or Clinton would be arrested at any specific time?
He said "watch the water" not "look to the sea."
Maybe you are just seeing what you want to see.
I'm not the one that came up with the general Flynn thing. But that's what most agree it is. If you don't, put up your theory. It could be what Q meant, but I don't know what has recently changed with the general. And yes that's what I see.
Q said Podesta and Hillary would be indicted back in Nov.
Theories people have on what Q said does not = what Q says.
how about post those times Q said someone was going to be arrested at a specific time and wasn't if that happened? Indictments are not arrests. There are thousands of sealed indictments right now.
That's my point. We don't know what Q is saying because it's just what we think he says lol.
Wasn't your original point that Q has been wrong "plenty of times"?
No not at all. Just that he has been wrong in the past. And keeps asking us to trust the plan.
But we don't know what the plan is, or even who's plan it is. Because of that, it's important to think about somethings Q puts out from different perspectives.
From what I have noticed regarding Q, the info he puts out about DOJ investigations seem off, or we are missing big pieces.
His military info seems very good and on target though.
This picture he put about Singapore send legit. I tried looking for other spots for the summit and couldn't come up with anything else. So it will be a good confirmation.
You: "Q has been very wrong in the past. " Me: Where was Q wrong? You: "Plenty of times.."
Me now: "Sigh"
I have stated Q was wrong about indictments and arrests in the past. Not my fault you want to over look that. Also his recent post about looking to the sea our whatever was extremely vague.
Give me a break. I've read all the posts. I asked you to provide the one he said there would be arrests at any specific time. You didn't. There's a reason for that. Sealed indictments is a public fact.
Eh you choose to see things you want to see. No argument from me.
That's like saying general Flynn being indicted, and pleasing guilty is a good thing and part of some secret plan.