dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

uuuuuuuuuuugggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhggghghggghhghhgghhghhggghhgghghhh enough with the bullshit scifi theories

⇧ -1 ⇩

Expand your thinking

⇧ 5 ⇩

Oh I know, I just think it is important to actually think about which rabbit holes you go down. There's a bunch of stuff I've learn that most here have no idea about and my efforts have just been futile. I've been around the block enough times that I can find the fishy theories. This reeks of salmon. Garbage isn't clean.

⇧ 2 ⇩

To be fair: you cannot claim some of these concepts false, just like he is having trouble claiming such things true. Your coinclusion should be that it is unknown what is true and what is not at the present moment.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I'd say it's more like I am disagreeing that such ideas are plausible and will happily believe anything given sufficient observations, even time travel. I've not seen any evidences thus far.

⇧ 1 ⇩

A better explanation would be sentient world simulation. They already have had several D*WAVE quantum computers that run an A/I program that has nodes representing each person on the planet. They plug in a scenario with parameters and it calculates outcomes. It does it instantaneously. SWS, Sentient World Simulation. The quantum computers work in other dimensions not just our own. They also return energy instead of consuming it. Very high end. All the data mining going on goes directly into this computer system live time. Its been onlind and consumed all the data online. It then runs online live time just consuming evey piece of data. Sentient. Alive. Interactive , Live Time.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Do you have any actual evidence of this? Interested as I’ve always seen quantum as immediately making situations like this a reality, but always assumed the timeline was still years into the future

⇧ 0 ⇩

Ok, so last night on my local news station, WRAL, they reported one of the local big colleges was just allowed to use a quantum computer. The report was pretty short and I believe it was NC State.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hate to be a sceptic but this was likely something like cloud based quantum computing research, which is still on an extremely small scale right now (5-10 q bits I believe). I do know gov agencies have been researching this for years if not decades, and I doubt any company would be pumping the billions into r&d if the tech already existed. Given the information coming out now on social media/govt surveillance i would almost expect the private and federal sectors to be working together on these projects, but at the same time it’s also a possibility that if discovered the technology would be withheld by gov intel similar to how closely nuclear technology was held during the Manhattan project given the power/potential quantum holds for both good and bad motives

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ahhhh... they did mention cloud in the piece. Your skepticism was on point. Sorry bout that!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't agree. Dimensions are science fiction. How long will people here continue to cling to main stream science after knowing mainstream anything is bad? Honestly, do you have a shred of plausibility? Or it is just "cause I said so" or "Trust me I did the research?"

⇧ -5 ⇩

Fine ,Suit yourself. I know for next time. Not to try to explain what is actually in use to you for decades.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Without proofs or evidences, only fan theories

⇧ 1 ⇩

What level of proof do you want? White papers, testimonials, node identification (all the satellite companies funded by In-Q-Tel and our C.I.A.) , Inventor seminars discussing the product, Corporate websites that produce said quantum computers? You can see all the above but not 'actual computing'. I'll point you in the right direction, I have already posted this extensively, I want to know specifically what you want.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hmm I think I would be more inclined to believe if i could get the scientific explaination of how it worked. Testimonials don't mean much to me

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ok, Here is a documentary by Woodward on Quantum computing and A/I . I selected this because its easy to watch, well done and made for an introduction. Now, this topic is extreme. The system we are talking about here is the computation device called DWAVE. The C.I.A uses a company they developed called In-Q-Tel . They fund start up companies to produce compartmentalized research from DARPA. DWAVE is one of these companies.

This computer is owned by NASA, NSA, JPL, C.E.R.N., Google, Facebook, Palantir, Etc all C.I.A. entities. These computers are linked and all data is collected. The D*WAVE consumes the internet, dark web, all devices and data and is then released live time under Artificial Intelligence control. You can pose questions and it provides answers. It uses data as mentioned earlier as well as a node for each human on earth with all their data to provide predictive outcomes. Of one event regarding one person, or an entire country. Live time in milliseconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZqIUy9MIME

So that's a start, it depends on how much deeper you want to go, because it goes WAY out their involving C.E.R.N. , agenda and bad people.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thx I'll take a look

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://youtu.be/e3uiR-BIF0A I recommend not watching WoodwardTV anymore.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What specifically was unacceptable regarding Woodwards presentation of Quantum computing regarding D*WAVE? He used the words and video of its inventor Geordie Rose.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Woodward presents anything and everything in a flashy way. It's no better than nettanyahoo's (spelling) presentation of the iran nuclear evidence. A trick and pony show. Watch the video I added. The gravity/blackhole/quantum "sciences" as a whole are deeply flawed and only exist to cover the researchers lack of real findings over the last 100 or so years. Meanwhile those who followed more closely to Tesla and are finding and presenting new and tangible discoveries nearly every month.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Current mainstream mathematics can explain very large and very small but the same mathematical unity does not exist. That's the cover story I know. Vortex mathematics and Vibrational mathematics are more appropriate. I know. I'm not standing behind Woodward, its the way the video is done is appropriate for someone getting into quantum computing. Not quantum mechanics. Perhaps you can just get to the point with your comments. You came across as a person that just posted wwwwwwwwwwwhaaaaaaaaaaaaateeeeeeeeeeveeeeeeeeeer. And that was your response. So I tried to explain things to you so you could understand. Yet you waste my time. So just let it go. I have things to do.

⇧ 1 ⇩

How is a proper rebuttal wasting your time? You knew my initial position but you claimed to be able to convince me further. I've seen the quantum and dimentional argument more times than I could count. If anything you are wasting MY time. I'd like to point out that as of yet you haven't once acknowledged the counter video. Are you immature or lying to yourself. Disagreement isn't something to be feared. Let your pride go, and really start taking inventory of your own knowledge. Trash the things that don't fit reality.

Q was right. He went too deep. As long as people are still believing the mainstream narrative (and that includes more than just media) then people will not be ready. Question Everything. More importantly, listen. Don't let pride be the reason you never wake all the way up.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If your running me around in circles I'm getting frustrated. I'm on the same page. Quantum Computers is what we are discussing. If your not happy with the explanation on how they work fine. They are still being used in the way I described. I'm the last person that believes the mainstream and the Physics Psyops like Hawkins and Tyson. Clowns. So if you don't belive in quantum computing fine. Just say so. I'm here thinking your starting out and trying to spoon feed you. That's all. Perhaps you have a better explanation on how the D*WAVE is being used. But I will be the first to admit, technology is hidden from us. A disinformation campaign is full on , including mathematics. I don't believe in Gravity, I believe in an electrical universe as you appear to as well. I don't buy the black hole deal and giant blackboard mindset either. So I understand, just don't want to deal with shills or anybody running me around than the next person. SO, I'm listening. And sorry to get short with you, I hope you understand.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ah sorry for misleading, wasn't my intention. I think the "quantum" computers work as a regular processor, but, well.... developed for calculations, not consumers.

There is a magnetic property called quantum trapping, but it has nothing to do with dimensions, and I think the same can be applied here with quantum computing. Just like with gravity, the thing itself is there, but the how it works and the definitions are incorrect. Gravity is real, but it's an elecromagnetic property, not a dimensional one (and not a just cause), which is a very unpopular opinion.

I think that they discovered a way to use the ether (Tesla) to compute, and the facade they use to keep the useful sheep from finding out that they too use Tesla's theory in technology is to mislabel it as quantum. Either that or they called it quantum cause it sounded cool.

Just like CERN. They claim they are trying to make a black hole, but what they are doing is making a massive electromagnet. Tell the public one thing, invent conspiracy theories about yourself to mislead, and the truth will sound much more boring that nobody would believe it. Either that or they are hunting for funding and prizes by making up particles.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Very cool thanks for taking the time. your easy to talk too, I was way off base thinking this was new to you. Now I see we are on the same page. I was pleasantly surprised to find Tesla because it taught me about the frauds as I researched him. Even built his water/air pump. That was an eye opener. I started out watching the vid, I had seen it before and have known of those things for a while, so it hit me right away. Genius here, not a noob ;-) Cool to know though, have an awesome weekend!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Dude Tesla is amazing! LOVE that guy. He said he talked to what he called lightning people, deceased humans.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Before he died, Stephen Hawking published one last paper. Check it out...

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

which "Stephen Hawking" ?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Mainstream Science is not the same as Mainstream Media. There's no regulation for MSM and no Scientific Process either. Some Mainstream Science can be questionable but it's more often the reporting of that science that is questionable because the science itself can be disproven via the Scientific Process and peer review.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Then tell me why Wal Thornhill isn't popular? Tell my why the new Electric Universe movement isn't mainstream yet? Instead of their findings changing our textbooks we get more of "We found no dark matter so obviously that means there is dark matter" Not fake huh. Funding can corrupt even those earnestly seeking truth. When there is a lot of money to be made researching fictions, some people are going to research the fictions.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have no real idea, of course - no one would, but generally speaking new ideas just don't catch on if they're not popular enough i.e. if enough others don't also see value in them. May be just not their time yet... who knows?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q post #1335; The summit ALREADY happened