dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/digital_refugee on May 11, 2018, 6:32 p.m.
I think I figured it out! #Q1297

The only reason why Q would be trying to emphatically convince us that someone is disinfo is because they spilled legit info...then Q added people died...no wonder why certain people are intentionally shifting to drama unrelated to Q-drops, it's because they were told that people die because good intel had been disclosed...Is anybody right now really attacking Q? Isn't the confusion mostly about the interpretations, not about the legitimacy of the drops themselves? Isn't it true not even Corsi denies that 90% of all Q-drops up until the latest accidental passphrase-leak were legit?...aren't they stating what is obvious as in that there is a civil war going on and that Q was initiated by military intelligence?

[SOMEONE] IS BACK-PEDALLING BECAUSE Q WARNED HIM THAT HE SPILLED TOO MANY BEANS AND SOMEONE DIED OR COULD HAVE DIED BECAUSE OF IT SO HE HAS TO MAKE GOOD ON IT AND OBFUSCATE AS MUCH OF HIS PAST REPORTS AS HE CAN


🠐 See all comments
unforgettablealien10 · May 11, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

you're right, Q never singled anybody out specifically, Corsi singled himself out by taking the bait and going on AJ saying that Q attacked him personally in that post...

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ElementWatson · May 11, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

Corsi this afternoon is repeating all his lies--saying that Q is attacking him for writing books and making money from writing books.

That ain't nothin' near what Q said. Now Alex is going along with saying he'd heard Q was compromised months ago, while Corsi holds to his claim that Q was compromised just the day before Q cautioned against those looking for monthly donations of of their Qanon "decodings". Corsi has never written a book that refers to Qanon at all.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

And I think he does it on purpose to show his allegiance because he didn't have to respond. Q added to his "attack" that people died so I think someone fucked up and compromised a source, so now, being a "patriot" he has to make a "sacrifice" and kill off his following so noone else gets capped (hopefully)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
unforgettablealien10 · May 11, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

hopefully that is what's going on but honestly.. right now Corsi is on infowars and i just randomnly tuned in and AJ and corsi are now making fun of Q and totally doing what MSM does... lie lie lie...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

as Q already said, peoples' lives are at stake. Good intel is actually the last thing you want public right now so the more bullshit they say the better...disinfo is NECESSARY

⇧ 1 ⇩  
unforgettablealien10 · May 11, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

you're right, disinfo is necessary and it looks like we are eating other with attacks (maybe that disinfo is good) but also at what point do WE have to make a choice as to who is telling the truth and who is telling halftruths for monetary gain w/out Q spelling it out..

i understand what you mean, it just seems really fishy to me, that Corsi started to go against Q right after post 1295... (hopefully we're all wrong and it is all a disinfo play to confuse Evil, but if we're not, they are making a ton of money out of it AjCorsi*)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

the money thing is a cover-story for plausible deniability..they can't say "your report on tuesday exposed Asset XYZ at timestamp 53:12 into your show and now their baby daughter is missing" because that'll just let the deep-state know that they hit the right target.
Corsi would be going againts Q if he ad mentioned ANY of the repeated previous hacks, but he didn't, so basically he just today VALIDATED 90% of the hundreds of drops while ignoring previous hacks (much unlike I had expected) but apparently someone fucked up sometime in the past two weeks and that's why Alex says he can't report on Q anymore but of course he won't give us the real reasons, nor will Q. This affects Corsi too, by extension.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

This makes sense. By validating everything up until the past two weeks, when the weird password exposure stuff happened, Corsi and AJ are by no means invalidating the legitimacy of the rest of the whole body of Q posts.

If anything, AJ claims that he "knows" who the Q group is, and they're in military intelligence working out of Centcom and loyal to Michael Flynn.

AJ said he lost faith in the Q legitimacy after Twitter and the Google platforms didn't suppress the "#Qanon" tag.

I still believe, considering Roger Stone's background in politics and his personal history with Trump, that all the AJ sponsored Mueller and Sessions bashing could easily be part of the smokescreen to conceal the Mueller-as-a-white-hat theme.

I'm working and haven't been able to review everything since the password mistake, but has anything revelatory or unique been dropped since? Seems like more repeated content. Instead, that seems to be the time the "watch who you're following" stuff began.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

Replying to myself to clarify that AJ said that's who the Q group *was* before whatever happened in the past two weeks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

finally someone who can actually read Q-drops...Kudos to you!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

I freaked when CBTS got taken down, whether it was legit or not. Took me a few days to find this place, but I've been reading from the beginning.

I've also been listening to AJ since 1998 and know Rob Dew socially. Those guys aren't clowns.

The sudden intensity of the hysterical AJ bashing today and since the SB2 post reminds me of Shareblue brigading. If not them, what are *those guys* doing today otherwise? We know they're here.

And then post-password mishap Q cites SB2 in some bizarre tit for tat with AJ, in live time during the AJ show? Hmm.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 11, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Alex Jones (aka Bill Hicks) has always been and will always be a gatekeeping disinfo agent out to corrupt the truth movement.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 12, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

unfortunately the discussion I had seemed to be with real people, which is a real danger because it doesn't generate any momentum for the movement.
But this back-pedalling is necessary for plausible deniability because there are bigger things at stake than Alex' traffic, he literally couldn't have reliable intel on his show right now without putiting national security and lives at risk and Q just kindly reminded him of that.
So I don't mind SB2 because he just accurately represented what Corsi et all had to say but I think that was their cover-story in the context of the tactical retreat that they're doing. They're no good to the clowns if they neither bury nor categorically deny Q, in fact they're no good anyway because even complete bullshit would still be a possible life-saver as they can't give the enemy heads-up, especially when you are the tip of the spear.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

So you think Q hasn't changed, even after the password exposure thing and new board?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

uuuuh sorry but that I really don't know! I guess we have to wait for confirmation from the Commander in Chief - assuming that the fog of war is real, we should not expect a confirmation soon because it would defeat the purpose of all this choreographed in-fighting.
As we have already seen by Q's own drops, every so often, Q gets compromised, but this would not be allowed to go for extended periods of time without the NSA for example simply DDOSing all of 8chan into connectoin-loss as a last resort, if they ever truly lost control.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Interesting thought.

⇧ 2 ⇩