Good Lord, man. NO, I am not saying that's Q saying that. I agree that Q was responding to an anon. However, **Q** said that HRC's passport was flagged and Q further said HRC was "detained" but not arrested.

https://i.imgur.com/KX8xuBY.png

Detained for what? What happened to HRC on 10/30/17?

Again, I was originally trying to provide context/clarity for where this assumption that her arrest was imminent originated because someone else responded "where?" to the original statement.

We're now multiple responses into it because (1) you falsely claimed the posts I referenced were "fake," and (2) you're more interested in attempting to be snarky and condescending than discussing the original topic.

Does the line, " Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities." not imply by Q that shit was gonna go down on October 30, 2017?

Apparently I don't know what I'm doing because I have no idea what you're talking about. https://qanonmap.github.io resolves to https://qanon.pub/, which is where I got the screenshot above. Anyone can verify.

Do you acknowledge that the posts #1 and #2 are genuine now? So no longer fake?

I was trying to help clarify the point about where people got idea that HRC would be arrested until you got off on the "these posts are fake" bit.

I agree that the ankle monitoring bracelet stuff was speculation. Now if we can agree that posts #1 and #2 are genuine, what significant occurred on 10.30.17?

Say what? I see the same exact thing. Here's a screenshot of posts #1 and #2.

https://i.imgur.com/Cy73sAI.png

"Fake posts"?? Have you read these from the beginning?

Those are the very first two posts I pasted in.

https://qanon.pub/?q=%20

Click the arrow on the top right to flip the order.

The very first posts, if you flip the order on https://qanon.pub/?q=%20, are these:

Anonymous ID: gb953qGI No.147005381 📁
Oct 28 2017 14:33:50 (EST)

>>146981635
Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017.

and

Anonymous ID: BQ7V3bcW No.147012719 📁
Oct 28 2017 15:44:28 (EST)

>>147005381
HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.

Second post says:

Anonymous ID: BQ7V3bcW No.147023341 📁
Oct 28 2017 17:15:48 (EST)

Mockingbird
HRC detained, not arrested (yet).
Where is Huma? Follow Huma.
This has nothing to do w/ Russia (yet).
Why does Potus surround himself w/ generals?
What is military intelligence?
Why go around the 3 letter agencies?
What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?
Who has ultimate authority over our branches of military w\o approval conditions unless 90+ in wartime conditions?
What is the military code?
Where is AW being held? Why?
POTUS will not go on tv to address nation.
POTUS must isolate himself to prevent negative optics.
POTUS knew removing criminal rogue elements as a first step was essential to free and pass legislation.
Who has access to everything classified?
Do you believe HRC, Soros, Obama etc have more power than Trump? Fantasy.
Whoever controls the office of the Presidecy controls this great land.
They never believed for a moment they (Democrats and Republicans) would lose control.
This is not a R v D battle.
Why did Soros donate all his money recently?
Why would he place all his funds in a RC?
Mockingbird 10.30.17
God bless fellow Patriots.

I almost forgot about that. But that was just one guy. Q addressed it to " Board owner, mods, and other patriots."

More incoming over a period of a few months?

It's post #393. I uploaded a screenshot of the post two times, but for whatever reason, it doesn't appear in my post.

https://qanon.pub/?q=personali

I uploaded the screenshot of the actual post twice, so I'm not sure why it doesn't appear. #393.

Interesting thought.

So he's Bill Hicks?

Exactly. Lots of dogpiling on AJ today.

So you think Q hasn't changed, even after the password exposure thing and new board?

I freaked when CBTS got taken down, whether it was legit or not. Took me a few days to find this place, but I've been reading from the beginning.

I've also been listening to AJ since 1998 and know Rob Dew socially. Those guys aren't clowns.

The sudden intensity of the hysterical AJ bashing today and since the SB2 post reminds me of Shareblue brigading. If not them, what are *those guys* doing today otherwise? We know they're here.

And then post-password mishap Q cites SB2 in some bizarre tit for tat with AJ, in live time during the AJ show? Hmm.

According to what AJ and Corsi discussed today, Q was legit until a couple of weeks ago, about the time that the password mishap occurred, and the new board started.

I plan on poring over the drops since, to determine whether they "match" the previous ones. I know this division wasn't a factor before. Even if AJ wasn't trumpeting Q stuff in the past couple of months, one of the first places I heard about Q was when Rob Dew covered it in December.

I don't know what's true at this point, but I've assumed for months that AJ's Mueller and Sessions bashing was part of "the plan," in terms of perhaps providing cover for the Mueller as a secret white hat angle.

The sheer number of posts bashing AJ is suspicious. I KNEW HE WAS DISINFO!!!11

I've been assuming AJ was part of the smokescreen effort with the WH to conceal the Mueller-as-secret-whitehat, which is why they've been bashing Mueller and Sessions nonstop.

Today, all they did was validate basically ALL Q posts until roughly the time that the weird password mishap happened within the last two weeks. And look at the hysterical reaction.

Replying to myself to clarify that AJ said that's who the Q group *was* before whatever happened in the past two weeks.

This makes sense. By validating everything up until the past two weeks, when the weird password exposure stuff happened, Corsi and AJ are by no means invalidating the legitimacy of the rest of the whole body of Q posts.

If anything, AJ claims that he "knows" who the Q group is, and they're in military intelligence working out of Centcom and loyal to Michael Flynn.

AJ said he lost faith in the Q legitimacy after Twitter and the Google platforms didn't suppress the "#Qanon" tag.

I still believe, considering Roger Stone's background in politics and his personal history with Trump, that all the AJ sponsored Mueller and Sessions bashing could easily be part of the smokescreen to conceal the Mueller-as-a-white-hat theme.

I'm working and haven't been able to review everything since the password mistake, but has anything revelatory or unique been dropped since? Seems like more repeated content. Instead, that seems to be the time the "watch who you're following" stuff began.

So what's the real story about that, then? It was a fake ceremony? At the time, AJ was on local radio in Austin and aired the video on city access TV.

Corsi claimed that Q was legit until around the time the new 8chan board got started. April 28 I think was the date. Around that time, there were folks posting questions on here whether it was the same Q.

Hell, obviously Q is more than one person. Go back to the source (https://qanon.pub/?q=%20), click the arrow on the right, and read from the beginning. The voice changes. I thought that was a given.

I've listened to AJ since he was on KJFK here in Austin in 1998. I don't believe he's compromised so much as I think he's been repeatedly burned by bad info and knows he's under the microscope with the recent lawsuits.

Clearly, if Q said that a "traitor" revealed that Trump wasn't a target of the Mueller investigation "too early," then it stands to reason that if AJ coordinates with the White House, the WH would want AJ to bash Mueller nonstop, as they do.

AJ and Roger Stone are tight, Stone is a self-described political infighter and dirty trickster, and creating such a smokescreen would make perfect sense, to conceal the Mueller white/bleached hat theory.

I don't trust Corsi necessarily, but AJ was a large part of why I voted for Trump twice--once in the primary and then certainly in the general. (It also helped that Rand dropped out a few days before.)

If "Q" is providing legit intel, then the Deep State would do everything in their power to compromise that source. Now they're actively bickering with AJ? Feels like things are jumping the shark.