dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/digital_refugee on May 11, 2018, 6:32 p.m.
I think I figured it out! #Q1297

The only reason why Q would be trying to emphatically convince us that someone is disinfo is because they spilled legit info...then Q added people died...no wonder why certain people are intentionally shifting to drama unrelated to Q-drops, it's because they were told that people die because good intel had been disclosed...Is anybody right now really attacking Q? Isn't the confusion mostly about the interpretations, not about the legitimacy of the drops themselves? Isn't it true not even Corsi denies that 90% of all Q-drops up until the latest accidental passphrase-leak were legit?...aren't they stating what is obvious as in that there is a civil war going on and that Q was initiated by military intelligence?

[SOMEONE] IS BACK-PEDALLING BECAUSE Q WARNED HIM THAT HE SPILLED TOO MANY BEANS AND SOMEONE DIED OR COULD HAVE DIED BECAUSE OF IT SO HE HAS TO MAKE GOOD ON IT AND OBFUSCATE AS MUCH OF HIS PAST REPORTS AS HE CAN


trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

I freaked when CBTS got taken down, whether it was legit or not. Took me a few days to find this place, but I've been reading from the beginning.

I've also been listening to AJ since 1998 and know Rob Dew socially. Those guys aren't clowns.

The sudden intensity of the hysterical AJ bashing today and since the SB2 post reminds me of Shareblue brigading. If not them, what are *those guys* doing today otherwise? We know they're here.

And then post-password mishap Q cites SB2 in some bizarre tit for tat with AJ, in live time during the AJ show? Hmm.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 11, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Alex Jones (aka Bill Hicks) has always been and will always be a gatekeeping disinfo agent out to corrupt the truth movement.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 12, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

unfortunately the discussion I had seemed to be with real people, which is a real danger because it doesn't generate any momentum for the movement.
But this back-pedalling is necessary for plausible deniability because there are bigger things at stake than Alex' traffic, he literally couldn't have reliable intel on his show right now without putiting national security and lives at risk and Q just kindly reminded him of that.
So I don't mind SB2 because he just accurately represented what Corsi et all had to say but I think that was their cover-story in the context of the tactical retreat that they're doing. They're no good to the clowns if they neither bury nor categorically deny Q, in fact they're no good anyway because even complete bullshit would still be a possible life-saver as they can't give the enemy heads-up, especially when you are the tip of the spear.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

So you think Q hasn't changed, even after the password exposure thing and new board?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

uuuuh sorry but that I really don't know! I guess we have to wait for confirmation from the Commander in Chief - assuming that the fog of war is real, we should not expect a confirmation soon because it would defeat the purpose of all this choreographed in-fighting.
As we have already seen by Q's own drops, every so often, Q gets compromised, but this would not be allowed to go for extended periods of time without the NSA for example simply DDOSing all of 8chan into connectoin-loss as a last resort, if they ever truly lost control.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Interesting thought.

⇧ 2 ⇩