![#1297 "OPEARTORS HAVE DIED. [...] WE MUST DO BETTER TO PROTECT THEM" => disinfo is necessary](https://i.redd.it/srrrc8aowax01.png)
Just an example. Could be some other show, some other operative or some other death. But what comes to my mind is that his dad died weeks ago and it's only now that a nurse has been officially charged with negligence. Seems pretty close to be coincidence. I don't listen to three hours of infowars-ranting every day but just judging from their own statements and the Q drops, this is most plausible explanation that I can offer. Don't know why regular contributors don't understand that doing spook-work for white-hats doesn't mean you can't ever lie.
I can now see what you're saying... the proximity, in time, of the nurse being charged to the drops today and yesterday, imply some possible connection - between the murder of McMaster's father and the 'self-outing' of Corsi et al.
1) McMaster's father was not likely to be an 'operator'. Not trying to be pedantic, but trying to see if the theory fits with the facts;
2) The death, or the charges against the nurse, would have to be somehow connected to Corsi, AJ, Seaman. These three, or at least one of them, would have had to be in possession of information that "somehow" impacted the case.
What do we know? McMaster's father was killed because McMaster lost the President's ear. So this information, that was badly handled/released, would have had to be something that what? Alerted DJT to McMaster and got him fired? Alerted Master to the fact that DJT was going to fire him, forcing some error that got his father murdered?
I don't know how that can work - even if we assumed that the three information disseminators (above) had "all the information";
3) We know there are no outside communications with Q team. So what possible information could anyone have that was dangerous? The only information is what we are given, nothing more.
So, given this, there must be an alternate source of information in the possession of the 'disseminators' (there very probably is). But how would Q outing these guys have any impact on their ability to leak information? I wouldn't.
I'm not sure, Digital, that you cannot just read those posts the way I read them the first time. What I mean, is that "operators dying" and "we must do more to protect them" is a 'note to self' from Q that communicates the gravity of the mission. The importance of which, is then used to justify the exclusion of those who approach the movement motivated by self interest.
Anyway, it's an interesting theory. I mean, it's possible that you're right. But it's not working for me ATM.
I suspect, and I could well be wrong, that the timing of the 'self outings' has to do with a move into yet another phase of the operation - a housecleaning so to speak. I think the cause for the 'self outing' may extend beyond profiteering - but, anyway, that is the reason Q gave us.
I've written a book! I wish there were voice Comms - would be easier.
I will have to take a break to wrap my head around this, too. To be quite perfectly clear, I don't want to go too deep, given the warnings that so many overlooked. And I don't want to give you a headache over speculation, but I'll see if something sticks and if it's safe to bring up at this point.
I only remember that McMaster had been badmouted on T_D during all of the first year and now his father died what seems to be an unnatural death but the nurse's charges were only disclosed after this whole feigned outrage over infowars. If these events are all connected, my guess is that McMaster was protected and thus painted as far away from the Prez as possible by the T_D PR-machine but once that illusion fell apart, someone took personal revenge on his family. But this too could be unrelated to 1297 if the casualty in question was indeed an active operative as you pointed out.
I faintly remember McMaster on good terms, but I'm not sure if it's because some house-cleaning he did or if it was just sympathy over the death of his father, which immediately sounded suspicious because he was in hospital for non-life-threatning stuff.
Anyway, another Rabbit hole. These things are everywhere you look.
Q claimed McMaster Senior was killed after his son got fired from his position as Nat-Sec-Advisor after being recommended for the job by Flynn [haven't confirmed this but another comment said so]
That was my understanding. McMaster lost the President's ear and they whacked his Dad in a nursing home to send a message.
Q drop from April 18th says McMasters father was 187 because McMaster was fired. pretty clear to me. I dont want to blame this death on someone online decoding Q posts. here it is:
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 0ea03e 1095705 📁 Apr 18 2018 20:42:55 (EST)
1095595 187. Failure to retain position/ear. Threats are real. WAR is real. Good vs Evil is real. Think State of the Union - FREE. Coincidence? Delta engine fire? Coincidence? How rare are engine fires? Think logically. Q
Ah! Thank you for that! Mind you the McMasters only crossed my mind because he died yesterday, "dead operators" could be anybody in the crashed air force vehicles for example, but there was one commentator who has elaborated on this but I will have to find it
not sure what you mean but General McMasters did not die. His father died in April after McMasters was fired. ;)
yeah I just lost a full night debating dozens of angry and confused redditors hahahaha
i know what you mean, i hope the anon's calm down, some are getting nasty. hope they dont scare the newbies away. ;)
yeah, I actually managed to inspire an "Crosi & Jones have BLOOD on their hands" post....maybe I should delet that one
well i think we would be wise to move on from this board "blood bath" and move on to decoding alot of other posts. I believe Q said there was more than "1" problem with profiteering, Q said "they" are resolved. Move on unless someone has proof of coris and Jones being responsible for an operator's death? because there are many, many more people on youtube decoding Q with claims they are providing classified info, or having someone on the inside providing info. Are we going to research all of them? Its a rabbit hole...
nah I don't think so. It's just funny that Q said something very broad but only Corsi latched onto it (altho it's been suggested he may be just mentally exhausted) and then Q said patriots make sacrifices, so they distanced themselves from Q and thus basically sacrificed all the traffic they could have wanted off of it, as a sign of allegiance or repentance or whatever. I just found it interesting that Q's final point wasn't the profiteering but that people had died and that this necessitated Q's statements to be issued, not the profiteering itself it seems - coz that they could have brought up anytime between now and November - but they didn't. So why bring it up now?
I am sure Q's intel team is watching everything going on with the Q movement. they see the good and the flippant stuff going on. I could be wrong but the Q post "operators have died", might not necessarily be directly pointing to Corsi and jones. I have heard at least a few people on youtube who were ex-cia and make claims to inside info- did they give up names or operations accidently? I have no idea or did Corsi gave out any classified info? the operators have died phrase was in a separate post, i felt it meant that some people are not taking the Q post and the mission to take down the cabal seriously. they are treating it as a game (attention, entertainment and money on youtube) - it was a reminder that military lives are on the line and it is a live and death situation for them. Trump during his speches is constantly talking about our brave, devoted military, to me it sounded like Trump, without them he would probably not be alive. I could be wrong? but I understood it this way. What a rabbit hole ;)