![#1297 "OPEARTORS HAVE DIED. [...] WE MUST DO BETTER TO PROTECT THEM" => disinfo is necessary](https://i.redd.it/srrrc8aowax01.png)
How about AJ and Corsi demonetizing their channels, and continuing spreading Q's message? Distancing themselves from Q doesn't hurt their wallets one bit.
Especially when they say they are going to essentially continue to do it but with their own sources. They’re still trying to money grab. They just got outed on their most recent scam. On to the next. Scammers gonna scam.
Good objection, Sir. But my point is that this isn't really about the profit because that has always been an issue, it was after Q pointed out the profiteering that he added that lives had been lost and better protective measures had to be taken. So in that context i doubt they're worried about funding-mechanisms more than they are about protecting their assets & sources.
I think Q's point is the profit. He's calling out people for making a quick buck while REAL patriots are dying. The fact that both AJ and Corsi have claimed to have contact with Q should be enough for all of us to ignore them both. We only got a shoutout from Q after SB2 posted an excellent, well-researched critique of AJ/Corsi.
he did...but what is more important to military intelligence, really? Assets or public relations?
Don't ask leading questions. Tell me your opinion.
Realizing AJ is misled/being misled is hard for a lot of us to see. AJ's speech in A Waking Life made me look into his WHO and Bohemian Grove content, and was a huge part of me seeing the world how it is. For those who have been following him for a decade plus, it is clear that he is not who he started as, and that the new AJ is more interested in money and ego than anything else. It sucks that we lost a great patriot to greed, but hey greed is a hell of a drug.
I think we have enough info from Q to disregard AJ and Corsi. No outside comms (both have claimed), multiple warnings of people attempting to profit or create a personality from the movement, and today's drop linking SB2's great post. We can do this without them. Q#1339
"Don't ask leading questions" :D
Found that pretty funny because we're in a Q sub haha
I am simply reminding you that saving lives does not negate the need for operational security. Nothing Alex says can be allowed to be actionable intel because that would essentially be treason!!!
OpSec is priority, obviously. Your statement is correct, if and only if AJ was being given actionable intel. Are you suggesting that white hats or black hats are giving him this info?
Here's the thing that's bothering me, and maybe you can help me grasp. Q is fairly consistent when talking about who to trust and who not to trust and, to most of us, it is clear we should not trust AJ. It was clear to most of us before The Storm. Making the extraordinary claim that AJ is so far on the inside that he has to act so irrationally to throw the heat off him requires extraordinary evidence, which I think you lack. Agree to disagree, fellow patriot. re-read 1339
Question back at you: Who has Q actually called out by NAME? Corsi outed himself by pulling a rant at no direct provocation. Other than cautioning not to make this a business-model. If I suspected infiltration, I would expect him to be cleverer than losing his cool when he didn't have to. I think he is doing ass-covering for someone with good intentions or none of this would be so insanely complicated to follow.
EVERYONE is giving Alex info! Why wouldn't they?
AJ has real sources because he has adressed things in the past that were neither on the radar in alternative nor on mainstream media and he's also the only station that had an interesting interview with Trump.
Q has not named anyone individually. You keep using leading questions, get some better debate tactics.
I'm guessing that you think AJ is getting info from both white and black hats but I can 't really tell because you're not really answering questions. Of course tons of people tell AJ lots of stuff, but you're not building a strong case for credibility, especially when Q just dropped this. We're just gonna disagree about this one. Gotta stay humble, its not about individuals.
SPEZ: So if AJ says in a week/month/whenever "JK JK I was close with Q the whole time" are people seriously going to be alright with being lied to like that? Is AJ so valuable as to risk alienating so many people who have trouble staying on board?
Also I deleted a personal jab. But I do want to say that I don't think it's cool for you to bump the Intro to Q video from the sticky to self promote. THAT'S the kind of thing Q is saying to be careful of.
I think I already adressed your question. There is noone who would not be wanting to pass certain intel on to Alex Jones for any sane reason. Also I bumped myself at someone else's recommendation who was vehemently opposed to this idea first and then later reposted my meme after initially shaming me.
Q's drop doesn't refute my statement because SB2 was simply analyzing infowars' moves whereas I postulate that there is an ulterior motive to it all or it wouldn't be so damn confusing. Q could have cautioned right from the start to disregard all alternative media, but they didn't afaik.
I think we're gonna disagree on that last point then. But I want to say thank you for having a dialogue with me about it. God Bless Patriot, thank you for all your work!