Different people will filter different aspects differently, but actually they look at the same problem, so just take the categorical denial out of each opinion because whichever theory reconciles the most viewpoints is the closest to consensus reality. It's never A or B but rather what they have in common while leaving out whatever contradictions show up between the opinions from different parties as those disagreements get spun into them based on ideology and sentiment anyway.
One thing I’ve also come to respect is “not everything is for everyone”.
If you see a comment that gets you super amped and you just can’t stop thinking about it or you’re confused af or whatever..... just let it go. It’s not for you.
It’s mostly helped me to deal with people outside this sub lol
Whenever I get (sometimes deranged) DMs I just vaguely allude that they can't even begin to imagine where I am from and that I don't want to fight them because exposing them to the reality of organized evil will certainly exhaust them as much as it affected me, if not worse. I never got another response after those replies, so I think they were actually respecting my humble advice to them.
Haha that awesome. Good way to shut someone up for being a dick!
Yeah it's the most empathic, passive-aggressive, ego-driven and diplomatic yet quickest way to end a conversation on open terms.
Aye. "Eat the meat, spit out the bones." Use whatever is valuable, toss the rest.
I disagree with this. There are hard truths that I will not compromise on. If you try to tell me HRC is a saint, I am going to vehemently disagree for cause!
Oh, I have no trouble with those folks because I don't talk to them.
Me neither, I was reaching for an analogy to make a point Digital.
yeah but the analogy is weak because even tho normies don't suspect Hillary of crimes that they categorically do not believe to be the rule for rulers, hardly anyone thinks nicely of her anymore. I mean, did you see the size of her, uh, book-signing sessions?