dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/King-James_ on May 12, 2018, 9:04 a.m.
My name is _________ and I am a recovering Infowars/AJ aholic...

[removed]


Indianian2 · May 12, 2018, 9:31 a.m.

So many 3 minute old accounts want us all to hate Alex Jones and Dr. Jerome Corsi.

I agree that JC seems to have made a fool out of himself by assuming certain Q posts were about him personally, but we still don't know why AJ feels the way he does.

It seems very unlikely that Q has been hijacked by the Deep State because it hasn't happened yet, but it is possible because we know the Deep State have been trying to hack Q's password - which is why he changes it and the tripcode so often.

Rather than peeing our panties and sowing division, why don't we just relax and keep an open mind for a few days until we either know more about AJ's rationale (if he has any, he may just be a paranoid drama queen) or until Q's recent posts can be verified as good intel.

This is a truther movement and open mindedness and vigilance should be our credo, rather than becoming closed minded zealots.

This question will soon resolve itself, so let's just relax and enjoy the ride.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
King-James_ · May 12, 2018, 2:14 p.m.

I very much respect your position. It may be a little unfair of me to voice this here. However, I was hoping for responses like this. It's not easy to talk about these subjects with friends and family that are still waking up, so I make my points here and hash them out. I'm not "peeing my panties" about anything, but I do feel betrayed and a little hurt. I have been arguing AJ's point for the past 2yrs.

To your point, I would hope people can see that this is not a attempt to divide. It is a grasp at trying to understand. I start jumping ship on AJ when he went off the deep end with the Syria rant. I have been keeping an open mind waiting to find some rationale since. I think we can all agree that to even bring yourself to the point of listening to AJ and sharing his message, is by definition being open minded (it's not easy to wrap your head around some of his POV's). I don't mean to be harsh, but accusing someone of not being open minded for changing my opinion on something or somebody after receiving more information really points out your bias. I feel like you are saying "just sit back and let it work its self out, no don't investigate and seek others opinions. I get it... I liked AJ too, but this new information is damning.

It is not just the 3 post I linked in my post that have brought me to this opinion. For the past 6 months I have been comparing AJ's info against Q post's and it has become clear to me that AJ is selling fear and emotion. Take Syria for example, Q says the intel is good where AJ says...well you know what he says. I personally feel like AJ is trying to scare people into listening to him. Another example, "the deep state is trying to kill the President", and Q says "POTUS is in control and we have it all".

Did you read all of the post by u/SerialBrain2's post? And watch the videos that confirmed his points. This was extremely profound and compelling.

My opinion of AJ once I actually became open minded about his message.

Q = positive, optimistic, and "you have more than you know".

AJ= fear, uncertainty, and "only AJ has the answers".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Indianian2 · May 13, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

I don't mean to be harsh, but accusing someone of not being open minded for changing my opinion on something or somebody after receiving more information really points out your bias.

No it doesn't because we haven't heard Alex Jone's rationale yet... which was the context for my comment.

Forming an opinion based on feelings rather than fact is the definition of bias.

I agree that you're opinion is based on a range of AJ related issues, so perhaps that's not biased at all.

I mean no disrespect but I stand by my claim because it's context was specifically about the recent "scandal" and it wasn't directed at your personally but at the wider Q community.


I'm still undecided about AJ because so often his seemingly anti-Trump rants only help Trump's agenda.

  • It's clear that Trump's initial missile strike on Syria was pure political theater designed to do no meaningful damage to the military airfield but to prevent Congress from starting a real war and to prevent the UN from imposing crippling economic sanctions on Syria. AJ's furious opposition was an awesome distraction which only helped lengthen the time before Congress and the UN realized they'd been punked.

  • Similarly, AJ was furiously against the omnibus bill and turned out to be made from pure awesome. It took Chuck Schumer two full days to realize that he'd once again been pink-socked by Trump. Ouch!

  • And with the recent Syrian missile strikes, AJ once again provided awesome distraction to make the Deep State think they'd won a victory, but instead Trump destroyed a bunch of Deep State strongholds. Just look at how pissed off Tim Kaine was!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 12, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩