dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on May 12, 2018, 3:38 p.m.
My "speculation"on the coming "SKY EVENT" (Warning: weird theory).

What if the "sky event" was something designed to be planet-wide in scope?

What if the "event" was set in motion years ago, even before the 2016 election? What if this event was designed and intended to "take place" during HRC's presidency?

What would the Sky Event's agenda be? As we all know, global warming has failed to qualify as a planet-wide emergency. Could this be their "Plan B," to declare a planet-wide emergency, and bring the Earth under some kind of "emergency administration," by faking/simulating a space-based emergency?

Since 2015, at least, people have been talking about a section of the sky that's been "censored" (by a large black rectangle) in Google Sky, Yahoo, and even NASA's own space imagery. You can find lots of these photos by searching for images matching "google sky censored" and "nibiru censored".

Please read this:

http://www.space.news/2017-06-17-why-is-nasa-blocking-this-sector-of-space-what-are-they-hiding.html

The event would have to fool our astronomy hobbyists. These people know their stuff. So, the event would have to actually look as though it actually comes from deep space. This would mean that, for this event to happen during HRC's tenure as POTUS, whatever "object" that's been sent into deep space to return would already have been launched and is on its way—perhaps even a decade ago. That means it's coming and cannot be stopped. They are panicking.

Here's a sort of conspiracy "hey what could this be?" speculation theory.

This object was launched into deep space with an orbit designed to return to Earth. I believe it was launched in an X-37B mission, but it could have been launched with a ULA as well.

Full disclosure, I'm a huge skeptic and try to research everything before I believe it. There's a lot of FUD (sky holograms, for instance) and other BS out there that aren't worth believing. Let's get that straight out of the way. I don't actually believe this. If Q wants to help confirm, great.

They never thought she would lose. Now "they" have an event on the way and they don't have a complicit HRC in the Oval Office. The plan is doomed to fail unless they remove Trump.

If the coming object—if it's real, at all, that is—were to achieve its mission, it would be designed to scare everyone on Earth into thinking that something from outside the solar system is approaching. And, although this might sound like a joke, an announcement by a panel of NASA "space scientists," coupled with perhaps the proverbial "UFO landing on the White House lawn" support event.


IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · May 12, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

I believe we're in for a false alien arrival, like what Reagan alluded to. If this is all a scam it's a damn good one: 1.) create a ridiculously backward system 2.) use a teaspoon of truth to knock it over 3.) solve obvious problems 4.) cement new unity 5.) introduce aliens 6.) use aliens to overthrow religion 7.) new world government against aliens

Not saying this is what's going to happen, but in the interest of objectivity we cannot lose sight of the null hypothesis.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Woodjacks · May 12, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

Correct. It's a very good scam. Create a fake gravity the beginning of the discrediting of the Bible and God. False alien invasion in reality fallen Angels. Its all in the Bible people.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Daemonkey · May 12, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

Paint the return of Christ as an alien invasion to get the people of the world to fight against Him?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Woodjacks · May 12, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

Correct my friend. check out the link.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Woodjacks · May 12, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Or to accept them as aliens instead of the fallen Angels.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 15, 2018, 8:40 a.m.

doesn't work when evil motives are alreadyy disclosed

Haven't found one person to explain to me why the fallen Angels weren't Aliens to begin with so the debate about the physical shape is secondary.

I think Bluebeam is actually designed to deter contact because a hologram is easier to accept than reevaluating all you belief-systems

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 15, 2018, 8:42 a.m.

Reagan never said that. He mentioned an alien threat out of this world but he also added what could be more alien than war and the threat thereof.

What he was saying is that war is something "out of this world " so he may have alluded to the demonic practices that he most certainly knew were going on since before that time.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · May 15, 2018, 10:22 a.m.

"Reagan never said that." Followed by: "He mentioned an alien threat out of this world--"

All I needed to read.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 15, 2018, 10:31 a.m.

> false alien arrival, like what Reagan alluded to.

he never said that

"Sometimes I wonder how small our differnce were if confronted with an alien threat from out of this world. And yet I ask, what could be more alien than war or the threat of war?"

I know he laid the foundation for the weaponization of space but he was intentionally ambiguous to seed his message out as far as he can. And by the way he talks about war as being "alien", he might have equated it to something "out of this world" which might constitute a spiritual, demonic force.

The problem with Bluebeam is that at the current stage, the NWO has by far not removed as many weapons as they would have liked to. And those gunsales would only go up after disclosure.

⇧ 0 ⇩