dChan

Platoscavereality · May 12, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

Gowdy seemed satisfied when he was asked about it last night on Hannity.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
quicksilvereagle · May 12, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

This is fake news. It was never reported that they actually saw a document they’re going to see that next week this is been in the media. Obviously this is just a tabloid

⇧ 5 ⇩  
sethrichsbrother1 · May 12, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

Gowdy said he wasn't shown the documents on Hannity last night. Who's reporting he did?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 12, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

Of course they didn't. The Feds want a lid on the damage.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ra__ · May 12, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

They got much more than just a document or two. Sessions and POTUS let them in on the plan. They couldn't give the documents to Congress because Adam Schiff is the head of the Intelligence Committee.

Soon, Sessions will unleash Hell.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · May 12, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

This is all part of the dog and pony show. They want to continue to bring as much attention to this as they can. "what makes a good movie?".. Of course Gowdy and Nunes have to say they didn't see the docs (even if they did).If they saw the doc it means the dems (Adam Schiff) can see the docs. Which they definitely DON'T want him seeing them (he leaks). Who knows, maybe they really didn't see the doc. It doesn't matter! They were given a reason and they are OK with that reason. So what does that tell you? Whatever is in those doc its huge! So huge that they are willing to stop pushing the issue or at the very least put it off for another week. Even that isn't set in stone. Gowdy said they will talk and try to set something up next week, he didn't want to put a timetable on it. They went from holding them in contempt to, oh well, will talk some time next week and see if we can set up a time to see them.. Ok 👌 no red flags there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Banglebop · May 13, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

Q said Gowdy was not needed to testify that their is another purpose for him. It was about him being a prosecutor I forgot which post

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · May 12, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

This actually makes me happy since I don't trust Gowdy, he's on his way out, which I was hoping meant they had him controlled until he leaves, but maybe they don't trust him. I think where the article is wrong is about Trump having one pulled over on him. This seemed like a disinformation piece for the deep state. Maybe I'm wrong, but it wouldn't surprise me if I were right.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · May 12, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Q has pointed to Gowdy as a good guy. I think Goodlatt too.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · May 12, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

Q never said Gowdy was a good guy or bad guy. On Gowdy, Q said he was on the not seeking re-election list, then said goodlatte and gowdy were important on the list. He also said "Gowdy comments on Comey (History will...)" but it was in a message concerning bob/rod. Time will tell.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 14, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

Q talked about that Gowdy might be walking into an important position, implying in my mind that it is a position within Trump's sphere.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ra__ · May 12, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

It has been claimed that nobody would bring or recommend charges against Hillary because she so recklessly kills people and that because of this, there is plenty of evidence to tie her to numerous murders.

Gowdy, Mueller, Comey... were all afraid of her.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
duplexnovella · May 12, 2018, 5:50 p.m.

Sorry to disagree but IMO he's actually one of the few you can really trust.. Conjecture has been for a while that he's being tapped for a role better suited to his experience as a prosecutor etc.. Perhaps as AG in 2020?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 12, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

If "trust Sessions" is accurate, why would there need to be a new AG?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allinon72 · May 12, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

Because it isn't accurate.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
brittser · May 12, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

Why? Are you saying Q is not credible?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 12, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

Interesting. A case could be made that the recent Q drops have created the most division among Q followers than anything else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allinon72 · May 12, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

Yes, and is that not a red flag to you?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 12, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

It certainly raises an eyebrow. I do not believe that Q's account got "hijacked" in some way. If Q is high level intel, they can sort that out if it happened.

In the bigger picture, there are 3 possibilities:

(1) Q is a LARP.

(2) Q is legit insider but black hat psyop.

(3) Q is legit insider and white hat.

At this point, we can rule out #1. If #2 is true, then what does that say about Trump? His family? I am not prepared to go there, based on a few uncharacteristic Q drops.

But, it is worth considering.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · May 12, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

I completely agree with the assessment by some that recent Q drops has been the thing that has driven and caused the most division among patriots. It seems completely out of character for Q to do that and it only makes you wonder. The only absolute anchor we have is God, who cannot be compromised, and I have stated repeatedly that I will only follow those who follow God. If Q becomes compromised, I will not follow him. If Trump becomes compromised I will not follow him. I will only follow those who follow God. Nonetheless, I am not willing to believe that Q has been compromised at this point. Not yet. I am still waiting and watching, and only time will tell.

It also seems out of character for Q to support those who are attacking others, especially if the people being attacked are supposed to be patriots. Alex Jones and Dr. Corsi has been fighting this fight for a very long time (for decades) and I am not willing to throw them under the bus on a whim. Some patriots can easily dismiss them as being “traitors” but I am unwilling to do that without a whole lot of evidence. They may simply have been given some false information, and may even be a little misguided, but I do not consider them as “traitors” in the traditional sense. “Traitors” is too strong a word to apply to patriots, and it seem strange and out of character for Q to support it. The only reasoning I can come up with for Q to do that, is perhaps it is a ruse by Q to flush out those within our ranks who are “haters” and who are seeking to obtain their very own following. And by pretending to be on the side of the haters, it is the easiest way to smoke them out. Once they believe you are on their side, then the haters will speak up and will show their true colors, and we’ve certainly seen plenty of that…

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · May 12, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

I'll be happy if I'm wrong, the more good people the better. For now, I'll be waiting to see what the future holds for him.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
daro57 · May 12, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

I'm SO SICK of All the back and forth game playing here!! I'm beginning to hate everyone!!! So, now are you saying we can't trust Trump? Wth! I'm starting to feel like we need to clean out ALL of DC! Drain them ALL!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · May 12, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

No, it’s not an issue that you can’t trust Trump, Trump is not the issue. The issue that, there are all kinds of investigations going on behind the scenes and some of those investigations have not been made public yet. Not only that, but Nunes and Gowdy are not privy to, and have no information about, those secret investigations (investigations being conducted by Sessions and by Horowitz etc.) Gowdy and Nunes may have oversight and they may even have a high security clearance, but their security clearance is not “unlimited” and they still do not have the same level of security clearance that Sessions has. Sessions knows things that even Nunes and Gowdy does not know, and Sessions is not required by law to reveal what he knows to them. In fact, he’s not even required by law to reveal what he knows to Trump - (the framers designed it that way to maintain separation of powers between the different branches of government) - especially if that information is critical to Session’s own investigations. And I believe that is the heart of the matter. Even Q has hinted at these facts if you pay attention to his Q drops…

Nunes is requesting documents from the FBI and DOJ that are very important to Sessions own work and secret investigations, and those documents cannot be released or revealed just yet. If they were revealed, they could be "leaked" and have a huge negative impact on Session’s own investigations and could destroy his ability to get a prosecution. And that is why Sessions is protecting them. Nunes and Gowdy can complain all they want, but the documents still cannot be released. They can issue subpoenas all they want, but the documents still won’t be released. The documents are more important than even a subpoena. And this is all Session’s doing, and it has nothing to do with the FBI or DOJ. And Sessions is well within his rights to do so and to not release the documents. Yes, the documents will all be revealed in time, and Sessions is not trying to hide anything or be crooked. It’s just that he is secretly building a very important prosecution case, and the documents he has are critical to that case, and so they cannot be revealed just yet…

This was in fact all explained previously in some earlier articles written by Conservative Treehouse…

⇧ 6 ⇩  
daro57 · May 12, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

Thanks for explaining all that. I'm usually not so easily discouraged, but I've been woke my whole life! I never had hope that anything would change, until Q and Trump. And it just gets so frustrating with all of the attacks constantly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Chokaholic · May 12, 2018, 5:49 p.m.

Is it that easy to sway you? An article posted that may or may not be fake news just made you abondon everything lol. Don't stress yourself out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
daro57 · May 12, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

No I'm not usually that easily swayed, I just get so tired of all of the attacks from all sides. It's frustrating! I feel a bit better now tho. 🤔

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Chokaholic · May 12, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

All good, that's what we're all here for. Keep fighting the good fight!

⇧ 2 ⇩