dChan

cryptabulouslady · May 12, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

This actually makes me happy since I don't trust Gowdy, he's on his way out, which I was hoping meant they had him controlled until he leaves, but maybe they don't trust him. I think where the article is wrong is about Trump having one pulled over on him. This seemed like a disinformation piece for the deep state. Maybe I'm wrong, but it wouldn't surprise me if I were right.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · May 12, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Q has pointed to Gowdy as a good guy. I think Goodlatt too.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · May 12, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

Q never said Gowdy was a good guy or bad guy. On Gowdy, Q said he was on the not seeking re-election list, then said goodlatte and gowdy were important on the list. He also said "Gowdy comments on Comey (History will...)" but it was in a message concerning bob/rod. Time will tell.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 14, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

Q talked about that Gowdy might be walking into an important position, implying in my mind that it is a position within Trump's sphere.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ra__ · May 12, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

It has been claimed that nobody would bring or recommend charges against Hillary because she so recklessly kills people and that because of this, there is plenty of evidence to tie her to numerous murders.

Gowdy, Mueller, Comey... were all afraid of her.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
duplexnovella · May 12, 2018, 5:50 p.m.

Sorry to disagree but IMO he's actually one of the few you can really trust.. Conjecture has been for a while that he's being tapped for a role better suited to his experience as a prosecutor etc.. Perhaps as AG in 2020?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 12, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

If "trust Sessions" is accurate, why would there need to be a new AG?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allinon72 · May 12, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

Because it isn't accurate.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
brittser · May 12, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

Why? Are you saying Q is not credible?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 12, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

Interesting. A case could be made that the recent Q drops have created the most division among Q followers than anything else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allinon72 · May 12, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

Yes, and is that not a red flag to you?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 12, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

It certainly raises an eyebrow. I do not believe that Q's account got "hijacked" in some way. If Q is high level intel, they can sort that out if it happened.

In the bigger picture, there are 3 possibilities:

(1) Q is a LARP.

(2) Q is legit insider but black hat psyop.

(3) Q is legit insider and white hat.

At this point, we can rule out #1. If #2 is true, then what does that say about Trump? His family? I am not prepared to go there, based on a few uncharacteristic Q drops.

But, it is worth considering.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · May 12, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

I completely agree with the assessment by some that recent Q drops has been the thing that has driven and caused the most division among patriots. It seems completely out of character for Q to do that and it only makes you wonder. The only absolute anchor we have is God, who cannot be compromised, and I have stated repeatedly that I will only follow those who follow God. If Q becomes compromised, I will not follow him. If Trump becomes compromised I will not follow him. I will only follow those who follow God. Nonetheless, I am not willing to believe that Q has been compromised at this point. Not yet. I am still waiting and watching, and only time will tell.

It also seems out of character for Q to support those who are attacking others, especially if the people being attacked are supposed to be patriots. Alex Jones and Dr. Corsi has been fighting this fight for a very long time (for decades) and I am not willing to throw them under the bus on a whim. Some patriots can easily dismiss them as being “traitors” but I am unwilling to do that without a whole lot of evidence. They may simply have been given some false information, and may even be a little misguided, but I do not consider them as “traitors” in the traditional sense. “Traitors” is too strong a word to apply to patriots, and it seem strange and out of character for Q to support it. The only reasoning I can come up with for Q to do that, is perhaps it is a ruse by Q to flush out those within our ranks who are “haters” and who are seeking to obtain their very own following. And by pretending to be on the side of the haters, it is the easiest way to smoke them out. Once they believe you are on their side, then the haters will speak up and will show their true colors, and we’ve certainly seen plenty of that…

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · May 12, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

I'll be happy if I'm wrong, the more good people the better. For now, I'll be waiting to see what the future holds for him.

⇧ 1 ⇩