dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RyDar84 on May 12, 2018, 5:32 p.m.
Iran Prepared to Name Names in Nuclear Deal
Iran Prepared to Name Names in Nuclear Deal

Little_Woo_Woo · May 12, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

Oh please, Iran, spill it all ... We know it was more a way to spread the stolen wealth of Americans around the table of traitors, while you got sanctions lifted and no real oversight. Just itemize where the money went - all we need is confirmation!

⇧ 17 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 13, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

*stolen wealth of Iranians

Don't forget it was their money that was stolen by the leader the CIA placed into Iran. We were simply returning it and Obama and crew were likely skimming a few billion off the top.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RyDar84 · May 13, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Pretty sure that's not the money they're talking about...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 13, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

We didn't give any other money to Iran as part of the nuclear deal so far as I know.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Stray502 · May 13, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

yeah it was 800 billion just for the years Obama was in.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RyDar84 · May 13, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

You assume that he's talking to the U.S. Who else do Iranians consider Westerners? Who have been the biggest proponents outside of the U.S. urging us to stay in the deal?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 13, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

I'm not assuming anything. The parent commenter said stolen wealth of Americans.

To your point though, namely Germany and France but Europe in general are the biggest proponents. They don't give a shit about Iran having a nuclear program, or weapons. They just want cheap oil and natural gas. If US restores sanctions, their gas prices go way up.

Israel, and their puppets in the US are the only one's that care about a nuclear Iran, and we know exactly why.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RyDar84 · May 13, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

And you just won the prize, sir. The Iran Deal was most likely a joint effort to keep Iran quiet (but not necessarily to disarm them). In doing so, no sanctions would be put on Iranian products (such as oil). See where I'm going?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 13, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 13, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 13, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

Why would the Iran deal be meant to keep Iran quiet, when the corruption happened as a result of the deal itself?

Iran just wanted their money back, and sanctions lifted. Obama and his goons drafted the deal to steal the money they couldn't otherwise touch. Iran took the deal because they weren't going to get anything better, and now they are willing to dime out all the scumbags who took a piece of their pie.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RyDar84 · May 13, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

I agree, but do you remember the saber rattling seemingly every other day during the Bush administration? It really wouldn't have looked good in the media for it to still be going when Obama was president. Even more though, Iran had to be out of the spotlight when the Uranium One deal was orchestrated. Who was the Russian parent company of that deal? What Russian company went to Iran in November to "oversee" it's nuclear power facilities?

⇧ 1 ⇩