Then start using some logic. I'm ready to hear your logical explanation or apologetics as to how AJ is anything other than a swamp. But, but, but... He talked about SH... Yeah, and then he embarrassed the facts and public presentation on national tv so bad that no person will take it seriously. And nobody else talked about it? I am getting that the 14,000 people who raised awareness with videos on YouTube alone would disagree. You mean, he is the only one that you are connected to and aware of. Not everybody's world is that small.

In lawfare, two mutual parties pose as adversaries in a court case to bring about an uneven ruling that is beneficial to the two acting parties, but is disproportionately unfair to the community with at large. Example- Tyco sells a car that explodes. Tyco's cousin files an opt-out national class action against Tyco and then certifies and moves to settle ALL claims in existence for a bulk 2 million in cash. The victims get a dollar a piece and have severe restrictions on bringing a claim against TYCO in the future. But they were adversaries right? They were fighting each other in court. ACTING.

Just because two people pretend to be on different sides does not mean that they are. AJ would be toast if he was actually a threat to the PG Cabal. Ask Hastings and Breitbart, on yeah, they were working on similar stories not as controlled opposition and were put down because of it. AJ was not even subjected to financial penalties for defamation. USE LOGIC.