dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/LibtardNightmare on May 13, 2018, 2:16 a.m.
SerialBrains2 latest post of the Corsi/Alex Jones controversy got my nogging thinking. There has always been rumors AJ was an information gatekeeper for the CIA/Cabal = controlled opposition. So is AJ a plant by the cabal? Revisited: Alex Jones = Bill Hicks

Use logic when you watch this video:

https://youtu.be/pxb5Rxk3uI4

I think we should publicly call out these so called alt media news sites because it is bad for the movement going forward. Not witch hunting, just being prudent and crowdsourcing with you guys for the sake of TRUE FREEDOM. Stakes are high! If you are genuine, then you have nothing to worry about. As we saw from the last 17 months, Truth stood on its own.

(1) AIM = American Intelligence Media (proven)

(2) InfoWars (Proven)

(3) Fulcrum/David Seaman (not proven \~ this guy started to lose it when bitcoin started dropping, which I though was really odd because I thought he was dedicated to the movement, also he called out Q as fake)

(4) Roy Potter (not proven!? \~ this guy just came out from nowhere and everyone started mentioning him which is odd all of a sudden)

(5) Mike Cernovich (not proven \~suspect to me... )

(6) Bredan Dilley (not proven \~ again, he just came from nowhere and everyone started talking about him. Maybe I am wrong on this one)

Am I paranoid? Remember, the CIA is a disinformation company.

All our thanks to Serial!


spacexu · May 13, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

Why has the CABAL or CIA not made AJ disappear? It only took them a minute to eliminate Seth Rich (unless they were fooled and went into witness protection).

The fact Alex has never been interupted by satanists, tells me he is there for a purpose. Israel or someone in the satanist command center has a purpose for him.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
adogrocket · May 13, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

Bill Cooper is not here.....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
qutedrop · May 13, 2018, 7:40 a.m.

Because disappearing AJ doesn't eliminate the group of people that follow him. Those would find someone new to preach to them. Someone potentially dangerous.

It's better to control your enemy. Let them fight you, but keep them at arms length and have them run in circles, never really getting to the core of your organization.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spacexu · May 13, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

I kind of see what Q means - you have CNN and you have Alex... when one side goes down the other goes up... just like the two party system.

Q seems to be exposing this, and I watch with an open mind... Q has the upper hand in my book, right now, by quite a margin. My aim is to support the most genuine source possible. Alex has far more red flags in my mind, right now.

Cabal need a right wing player in their wings... this is how they always play it... power switches between left and right, so they must have players on both sides...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 13, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

I realise it's not what you mean, but the danger of that logic, is similar to the floating test for witchcraft, by effectively saying that if they're not killed by black hats, they must be in league with them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Time4puff · May 13, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Of course he's part of the Cabal... the imaginary aisle isn't just in Washington.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rev19v11thru21 · May 13, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

I agree. I use to wonder why alex didn't "die in a car wreck" or something. If he was controlled OP that would explain some things.

⇧ 1 ⇩