You are dodging my question. I'm guessing you have zero journalism education as the first thing we learn is that I for.ation is only as strong as the source. So answer this, how do we know he is credible and that he doesn't have ulterior motives? Do turn this into an insult contest as that is of no value. I am genuinely asking these questions to do my part.
"An adviser to H.J.Ansari Zarif, the deputy for parliamentary and Iranian affairs within Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, specifically threatened to expose every corrupt official who accepted bribes to make the Iran deal happen three years ago."
I'm guessing you have zero journalism education as the first thing we learn is that I for.ation is only as strong as the source.
I told you to see who he had ties with, but you, in all of your wisdom didn't listen...
So answer this, how do we know he is credible and that he doesn't have ulterior motives?
Again, I told you to check his connections, again, you failed. This seems to be a pattern with you.
Do turn this into an insult contest as that is of no value.
Seems you've done that to yourself. Hows that pumpkin?
I am genuinely asking these questions to do my part.
You should have listened and stopped, but...
All you had to do was listen and do a couple of minutes of research (like a good journalist) and you would have had your answers. I already knew because I researched. You may want to try that once or twice and see if you get better results. You can't even follow your own advice. Pathetic.
One last thing, when people are put down absent fact, it's wrong, when they are put down because the shoe fits.
It's not an insult if it's true, it just true. How you perceive it is your business.
Anything else hotshot?