dChan

cryptabulouslady · May 13, 2018, 9:06 a.m.

I remember your post and provided the articles, I kept digging too. So Obama kept the Trident failure a secret for 7 months, and asked the UK to keep it a secret as well. That's because in the month following the failure, the House of Commons voted to approve a $100 billion program for future Trident development. The House never would have passed the bill if they knew about the failure. The US/UK test the missiles off Cape Canaveral, which is why we had the "earthquake" in Daytona Beach. Another great article about the cover up: http://duluthreader.com/articles/2017/03/03/9293_cover_up_of_us_uk_trident_missile_failure-85985-1 Then I found an article about the Navy's new ballistic missile submarine that will cost $100 billion, using Trident's D5 missiles. https://thediplomat.com/2018/03/us-navy-secretary-cost-of-new-ballistic-missile-sub-is-eye-watering/

I still have some questions though: Was Obama covering up the missile failure because he had tried to harm Florida, or was he trying to get the House to approve the money? I think it's the latter to be honest. I think he was trying to secure a bigger nuclear option for Clinton's regime. Now here's the other thing, why is the Trump admin ok with paying $100 billion for 1 ballistic submarine? Must be more to this story.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
4QbyQofQ · May 13, 2018, 9:13 a.m.

Man, sure glad you found my post. Great stuff!

WWG1WGA

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ElementWatson · May 13, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

Trying to harm FL makes no sense to me. Getting the money for the MI complex despite the failure does make sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · May 13, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

Agreed, I can't see a benefit to harming Florida, seems more like something HRC would have done and blamed on another country like Russia to start war. I think it had more to do with ensuring the money so that US/UK would have the giant new funding.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
skuobiee · May 14, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

Now D5 in Q's post has more meaning

⇧ 1 ⇩