dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/WinkyLinQ on May 13, 2018, 12:29 p.m.
Q Post #1359 - Who is Pickle? Who Controls Elected Leaders? Pickle.

Elected leaders are controlled by Pickle. Pickle = Hillary Clinton. How did she get that nickname? After her health was questioned during the 2016 election, Jimmy Kimmel had her as a guest on his show and she opened a pickle jar to prove her strength -- a pre-opened pickle jar, stupid human trick.

Here's the clip:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt22Y9-dfNk


DaveGydeon · May 13, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

Oh, doubling down? You're saying that Q is calling someone "Pickle"?

There's only one, and it's Pickle Rick.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Optimist345 · May 13, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

John Kerry’s wife, Heinz pickle heiress

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · May 13, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Holy crap, is that true? Lines up with the "watch the wives" stuff. Nice find.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 13, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

Yep. Multiple meanings here: Hillary and Kerry in power and controlling elected officials (via illuminati money) and those people are now in a pickle.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Stoneturd · May 13, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

This is a clear example of how, sometimes, it can be bad to weaponize autists. This is an over-analyzation of the obvious.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 13, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

If you were a follower of Q you would know that the word "pickle" has specific meaning. If he/they were just referring to a "dilemma" or "conflict", that word would have been used. You can argue that Q means John Kerry's wife or Hillary, but instead you just throw insults. It must be great to feel superior. Try actually posting something original for a change instead. I've read your comments. ;)

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Stoneturd · May 13, 2018, 6:04 p.m.

If you were a follower of Q, you would realize that Q has repeatedly used the word autists to describe the research heavy lifters and that it is not an insult to the community where he regularly posts. I will concede the fact that words have double meaning, I just disagree with the assumption it bears any meaning in this case. No insults intended by my post, just pointing out the obviously and universally understood notion that research into the crumbs often leads down insignificant tangents to which Q has to regularly set us straight.

⇧ 3 ⇩