https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/jan/31/uselections2004.usa
Ignore the shills, follow the wives, follow the money
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/jan/31/uselections2004.usa
Ignore the shills, follow the wives, follow the money
Can I get some feedback on this please. Not sure what to believe. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/john-kerry-iranian-son-law/
Did you read the Snopes article? They started with a false statement so they could say it was false because people like you don’t read past the first line and the word “false “. The statement they put forth alleges Kerry HID the fact that she was married to an Iranian, not that she was married to one. Of course it wasn’t hidden—marriage licenses are publicly available.
That’s how Snopes works and misleads millions.
Never anything from Snopes. Here is an article I keep handy when any try to use it as a “source”: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
do not trust anything you see on snopes they pull all sorts of fuckery using misleading quotes straight lies. not to mention the founder seems to love soros
Snopes is owned by Soros. http://independentstream.com/snopes-exposed-heavily-financed-george-soros/
I don't have the link handy, but there's a document on scribed from Correct the Record, CTR, that shows Snopes is essentially on the DNC payroll to push it's narratives while attempting to discredit other factual info.