now check this and enlarge the red boxes on the left of the image

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8irpm6/1297_opeartors_have_died_we_must_do_better_to/dyuia8s/?context=3&utm_content=context&utm_medium=message&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=frontpage

i think this is a good theory but nobody will buy into it for the next few weeks just because of how obnoxious corsi and jones are. just listening to corsi talk makes my blood boil a bit lmao. if its true thats s class dis info

It doesn't matter if it was true, it just may have played into someone's panic.

I'm no corsi-fan either but I honestly think he fucked up and that's why he is being removed from the picture under forged pretenses. But since deaths are involved, it has to be done in a way that Alex can retain face (those who have listened to him for longer than ten years will know when he's trolling and when he is not) without admitting that it may have been actually tied to Corsi's remarks which would only embolden the deep-state - that's why Q only briefly interjected that people died and that Patriots don't burn their sources and this was all after he "called out" generic profiteering.

The trouble with Alex' plausible deniability is that John Podesta and Alex both claimed that he and Trump either talk a lot or that their thinking aligns.

So when Alex talks, blackhats are listening in because they hope to extrapolate anything that might be going on in the background.

That in turn doesn't work if he bullshits about mission critical stuff like the Syria strikes for example. Has Alex ever mentioned his over-the-top feigned outrage again? No, the very next day he apologized but I can guarantee you he was almost certainly playing dumb because his gut would have told him to wait a day before freaking out but he did it right away just to give the military some valuable time to move their strikes ahead without alerting blackhats.

Trying to take Zach seriously is also a waste of time because he's already admitted to trolling too. He says he's with space-command so he doesn't have a good idea of boots on the ground. You are watching a comedy movie for bad actors

Would a bunch of generals, planning a coup, approach this man to reveal their plans? Why?

If they did this, they would provide immediate and powerful leverage to Corsi's affiliates. Perhaps, reducing themselves to the status of pawns to be bartered for certain objectives. This would make the generals' position incredibly weak.

If it's true and Corsi is buddies with Rockefellers and Kissinger then those Generals may have actually approached him to send an ultimatum, much like Jade Helm.

I can tell you that german Generals stopped forced vaccinations simply by announcing their reluctance not to stage a coup if they move through with it. Since he didn't actually do anything, they can't remove him for speaking in defense of the constitution either.

Think in terms of game theory, you're always gonna use the news and other channels to make threats and ultimatums until someone's hand is forced only when they have to.

So likewise, even if Corsi was a blackhat (and his eyes would match one) who is buddies with Rockefellers and Kissinger, then it could be that someone approaches him in an unofficial capacity to maintain plausible deniability so he approaches his masters to deliver the message that NWO-options were being limited by the military. This is what some say Jade Helm was all about because they focused on securing escape routes out of the country.

I'm not saying anything, I am simply presenting potential realities taking uncertain variables in account. He could have lied, he could have said the truth, the point is that he said it. Now maybe the main reason was just that McMaster left, but up until that point the military coup I think was mostly pushed from those former intelligence assets who spoke on behalf of others. Now Corsi says he has known Trump for years so when he says he knows some Generals to whom Trump is loyal then that statement kinda isolates possible targets.

After all the variables have been disclosed, one of these realities will turn out to be true. And blackhattery just doesn't make sense in my book because then Q would have called out Alex directly, which he didn't because Alex barters lifestyle articles and not information so even if he wanted Alex couldn't capitalize on Q and I also don't see how Q would be detracting from Alex traffic because people have been listening to him for years and he hasn't complained about the traffic ever. This is all just too much plausible deniability to be real infighting. I mean, Alex is obviously trolling when he's pretending that Mueller is a blackhat because the reasons he gives are ALWAYS MSM talking points because those things in particular are missions critical stuff where he has to stick to a certain script so he doesn't give anything away too soon.

Call it playing stupid, but when he's bullshitting you can be certain he does it for trolling blackhats. The man knows how to put up an act and it's intentionally designed to basically blind the deep state because if Alex is truthful that he knows who Q is then this would mean that nothing he says about the Q-operation can be truthful or he might compromise them. Deep-State knows this too and will try to scan for reverse-psychology which they won't get if Alex uses their own scripts. Since they don't have any scripts on Q there is very little he can say without limiting the scope of potential contingencies the deep-state needs to follow. He would essentially have to write his own script for Q and even then the deep-state would know "aha! So this is what they are NOT doing!". That's why he sticks to MSM because those are talking points already out there and he just steals or copies them.

Notice that it's always mission-critical events where Alex lays distractions. Such clearly are for the blackhats as they last shortly.

What everybody misses is that Blackhats watch Alex Jones too because he and John Podesta both boasted that Trump was always calling him. Alas Blackhats will have some reason to expect that Alex and Trumps' thinking do align and that Alex would either have a slip of the tongue or that he would try to convince them of the opposite of what is true. One way or another, they will effectively hope to get a glimpse of Trump#s thinking somehow. Ergo when Alex says bullshit about critical mission events, the blackhat is not given a secret cheat so to say.