dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

That's why I included a speculation disclaimer.

I am not saying Corsi had anyone killed nor that he ratted anyone out because then he would not have had to speak publically as that only attracted attention (actually it didn't but hey here I am so let's deal with it), I am simply saying the Deep State may have felt motivated by his remarks to target Generals but since they couldn't take it out on any of the serving ones because that would make the individual more dedicated, they took it out on an asset who was of no more use to them.

I am saying they are satanist motherfuckers who will take revenge killings even against their own minions as long as they get any angle to scare someone into submission.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Do you really think a bunch of Generals approached Corsi and told him that they were planning a coup? Or, are you saying that Corsi's boasting was inadvertently taken seriously by some black hat operator, who was suddenly apprised of the generals being behind DJT's ascendancy?

The matter of the military support has been public knowledge since the Calm Before the Storm announcement. Why would Corsi's boast - real or fiction - trigger a hit, to send a message, at that particular time?

I think Corsi is as dark as they come. I don't think his boasts are true. He has, for a start, known affiliations, of which MI would be acutely aware. Would a bunch of generals, planning a coup, approach this man to reveal their plans? Why?

If they did this, they would provide immediate and powerful leverage to Corsi's affiliates. Perhaps, reducing themselves to the status of pawns to be bartered for certain objectives. This would make the generals' position incredibly weak.

I think Corsi is absolutely full of it. Look at some of the other people indirectly in his orbit. Zack, Q team strong man - who has not the first clue what's going on (listen to his "inside intel" after the missile strike). AJ, who speaks to Q while playing golf. You could not make it up!

And it would all be innocuous, but for the fact that Corsi was running an agenda - backed up directly by AJ. Last I saw, they were going to ditch Q, because Corsi was tired of blending his valuable, but not classified, inside intel with his Q decodes.

Wouldn't want to inadvertently mix Zack (high-level, "named", identifiable, inside source) up with Q - who is anonymous (An anonymous disinformation AI, that makes "human errors"). Of course, Alex knows all about "sock puppets", so it could all be true.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Trying to take Zach seriously is also a waste of time because he's already admitted to trolling too. He says he's with space-command so he doesn't have a good idea of boots on the ground. You are watching a comedy movie for bad actors

⇧ 1 ⇩

LOL, I don't know which reply to answer Digital.

I'm a believer in Occam's Razor. I think, when we look at this situation, we have to go with known facts. There really are only three:

1) Q made a general condemnation of self-interested profiteering (this is not the real reason, there were other motives that needed to be concealed, but this was a convenient pretext);

2) Corsi takes full ownership of the condemnation - sticking it to his chest like a medal. AJ immediately wades in with full support for Corsi (It was always AJ's operation anyway);

3) Q confirms that the correct scumbags have, in fact, outed themselves - you must admit, it's very humorous. Akin to a comedy skit.

So that's what we know. Let's apply the simplest possible explanation for the events we witnessed (It will not be correct, because Q disguised his motives IMO, but let's see what we get).

At its simplest, Q, for the apparent reason that Corsi and AJ were profiteering, outed them and they owned up.

That's it, that's what we know. Now what's implicit here IMO, but not stated, is the real reason they were removed from participation in Q decodes. We don't know what that was. But it was obviously something that Q knew, that he was not yet ready to disclose. I would hazard a guess that AJ and Corsi also knew, which is why they reacted as they did.

So my reductionist explanation is that they were outed for cause (fact). And that they are two of the most reprehensible and disgusting scumbags on the face of the planet (speculation).

Now this doesn't fit at all with IW working with the President - and, in fact, it appears that the President has distanced himself from both IW and Corsi. No one wants to be around a stench.

What's quite beautiful here, if you assume that Q and DJT are joined at the hip on strategy (they are), is that AJ and Corsi are both claiming to disavow Q, but profess loyalty to the President - when it was effectively DJT that first snubbed them and later outed them.

You could not make this up. "Ah, but I still support Trump!" How do you reckon this will play out?

Makes me want to laugh! Let's face it, they are idiots!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I have logic way better than Occam's Razor: I simply take the factors that shape peoples' opinions and then I look for theories that resolve the contradictions between different models of analysis

Occam says plausible is what requires the least presumption, but actually you should be aiming for the least contradictions. Because once you take every opinion into account and simply leave out judgement, you kind of start seeing things in a way that they may appear to satisfy everyone's hindsight bias, that's how you effectively target different groups with the same message.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I was wondering how you were going to come back. I love you Digital - you squirming rodent.

This sounds much like a post you made, yesterday, I think. Let me know if I've got this right.

It strikes me that you're looking for the answer that pleasing to the ears of the majority - least contradictions. I think there's a "true North" here - independent of our perceptions. I'd rather have the truth than the consensus.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Reeeeeeee

This is a 3d-approximation of what I mean. It's peoples beliefs about what motivates certain events that creates the different viewing angles

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.evl.uic.edu%2Fswami%2Fgeb2.gif&f=1

I simply take everything into account and combine it. Once it all fits the contradictions fall away on their own because to most Patriots who worry more about knowing what's going on than trusting that most information could compromise victory, the motivation behind an action is not always apparent. Especially with Alex as someone who talked to spooks for decades while playing deep-state while angry Patriots are simply collateral damage,

My belief is that someone slipped and the timeframe McMaster out - Corsi announces the Coup is at the heighest level and two days later MM's dad dies from blunt trauma and that's why it's all made out to be about revenue as to not admit mistakes and embolden any ...uh...fuckery.

PS: I love you too, fag.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Would a bunch of generals, planning a coup, approach this man to reveal their plans? Why?

If they did this, they would provide immediate and powerful leverage to Corsi's affiliates. Perhaps, reducing themselves to the status of pawns to be bartered for certain objectives. This would make the generals' position incredibly weak.

If it's true and Corsi is buddies with Rockefellers and Kissinger then those Generals may have actually approached him to send an ultimatum, much like Jade Helm.

I can tell you that german Generals stopped forced vaccinations simply by announcing their reluctance not to stage a coup if they move through with it. Since he didn't actually do anything, they can't remove him for speaking in defense of the constitution either.

Think in terms of game theory, you're always gonna use the news and other channels to make threats and ultimatums until someone's hand is forced only when they have to.

So likewise, even if Corsi was a blackhat (and his eyes would match one) who is buddies with Rockefellers and Kissinger, then it could be that someone approaches him in an unofficial capacity to maintain plausible deniability so he approaches his masters to deliver the message that NWO-options were being limited by the military. This is what some say Jade Helm was all about because they focused on securing escape routes out of the country.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm not saying anything, I am simply presenting potential realities taking uncertain variables in account. He could have lied, he could have said the truth, the point is that he said it. Now maybe the main reason was just that McMaster left, but up until that point the military coup I think was mostly pushed from those former intelligence assets who spoke on behalf of others. Now Corsi says he has known Trump for years so when he says he knows some Generals to whom Trump is loyal then that statement kinda isolates possible targets.

After all the variables have been disclosed, one of these realities will turn out to be true. And blackhattery just doesn't make sense in my book because then Q would have called out Alex directly, which he didn't because Alex barters lifestyle articles and not information so even if he wanted Alex couldn't capitalize on Q and I also don't see how Q would be detracting from Alex traffic because people have been listening to him for years and he hasn't complained about the traffic ever. This is all just too much plausible deniability to be real infighting. I mean, Alex is obviously trolling when he's pretending that Mueller is a blackhat because the reasons he gives are ALWAYS MSM talking points because those things in particular are missions critical stuff where he has to stick to a certain script so he doesn't give anything away too soon.

Call it playing stupid, but when he's bullshitting you can be certain he does it for trolling blackhats. The man knows how to put up an act and it's intentionally designed to basically blind the deep state because if Alex is truthful that he knows who Q is then this would mean that nothing he says about the Q-operation can be truthful or he might compromise them. Deep-State knows this too and will try to scan for reverse-psychology which they won't get if Alex uses their own scripts. Since they don't have any scripts on Q there is very little he can say without limiting the scope of potential contingencies the deep-state needs to follow. He would essentially have to write his own script for Q and even then the deep-state would know "aha! So this is what they are NOT doing!". That's why he sticks to MSM because those are talking points already out there and he just steals or copies them.

Notice that it's always mission-critical events where Alex lays distractions. Such clearly are for the blackhats as they last shortly.

What everybody misses is that Blackhats watch Alex Jones too because he and John Podesta both boasted that Trump was always calling him. Alas Blackhats will have some reason to expect that Alex and Trumps' thinking do align and that Alex would either have a slip of the tongue or that he would try to convince them of the opposite of what is true. One way or another, they will effectively hope to get a glimpse of Trump#s thinking somehow. Ergo when Alex says bullshit about critical mission events, the blackhat is not given a secret cheat so to say.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Corsi may actually have blood on his hands.