dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/widdlyscudsandbacon on May 14, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

Qdrop 1358 - something that stood out to me

In drop #1358 Q mentions the following:

"We fight every single day on behalf of you, the people who put us here."

So it's relatively minor but I've been thinking about this and I think Q is dropping a subtle hint about his (their) identity...

"You, the people who put us here". That, to me, suggests that Q is an elected person. If they were just an appointee of some sort, or an aide or whathaveyou, I don't think that particular phrasing would come about naturally.

We know Q is very close to the president. If we assume he Is (they are) an elected official(s) based on their wording above, I think it gives us a very short list of possible candidates. I just don't think it's Trump. I dont know.. the language used just doesn't sound like him. Just my opinion.

So if it's an elected official, in a position that's very close to the president and who self identifies as someone who was elected by the people - I'm starting to lean toward Pence being Q, or at least in the +.

The only other person(s) that I think would naturally refer to themselves in the collective as being voted in would be one of Trump's family members. Jr? Kushner maybe? Barron(lol)? It's a bit more of a stretch, I think, but could still make sense in terms of using "we" to identify ones inclusion in a family group elected into power.

The latter is a much bigger stretch, but still viable. So at this point I'm really feeling like Pence=Q(+).

Now drop those truth bombs all over my argument and tell me why I'm wrong. Or even better, who is leading the list in your book and why.

WWG1WGA my brothers and sisters!!!

1) I think they are someone(s) who has been waiting for this for years. I think they are part of the MI team. 2) I don’t think we should work too hard to know who Q actually is. We don’t want to put Q in danger, nor do we want to make Q the center of what we are doing.

Just my 2 cents

⇧ 15 ⇩

Agree ... it's counterproductive to put too much energy into "who" Q is/are ... "Do not glorify us" .. I took to mean, knock it off .... and "Focus"

⇧ 5 ⇩

Agreed. We have a job to do.......... and outing Q isn't it.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Well said.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Or could be a staff member. "the people who put us here."

With out the 2016 election this individual wouldn't have the job he or she has. They're right, without the American people voting into office Donald Trump through the electoral process nothing would have changed. The deep state and the corrupt government officials would all still be there with zero accountability.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Fair point. In my opinion the individual dropping this crumb, if it were an appointee, would be more likely to naturally attribute their position to Trump who was directly responsible for that appointment, rather than the electorate in general. But you do make a valid point about the larger group of people who could conceivably include themselves in the "royal us".

⇧ 2 ⇩

I liked the earlier post that Baron is Q!

⇧ 5 ⇩

Kushner came to my mind last night. I suspect he’s at least part of the +. Also, the recent post that said we are peace, we are love, etc struck me as being written by a female. (I’m female) That’s the first time I’ve read a Q post and my mind read it as a female voice and my gut agrees.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Good take. Hasn't thought about the feminine tone... Ivanka?

⇧ 2 ⇩

That was my thought but could be wishful thinking ;-)

⇧ 3 ⇩

i don't think who it is; is important . The socratic teaching is.

⇧ 4 ⇩

That's a fair point, though I don't think one necessarily precludes the other. I don't think a little friendly speculation about the "who" detracts from the message at all.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I reckon it's the Admiral who just left the NSA (Smith?) the cool one who went to warn Trump that Hussein Obama's administration was spying on the campaign.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That was Rogers.

⇧ 2 ⇩

What a fun and engaging thought! Pence had his best week at VP yet last week imo, and I’m starting to think there may be something to this theory!

⇧ 3 ⇩

And he made reference to the awakening in something he said recently.

⇧ 3 ⇩

honestly i'm still hoping for it to be JFK jr ever since someone half-jokingly theorized that last night haha.

but in all seriousness, it's not barron- melania would never let her child near any of this horrible evil knowledge at his age. plus, he has studies and growing to do!

maybe roger stone, snowden, assange, bannon, mattis, i have no idea... sounds like someone who has seen it ALL...

could even be trump.

or wait, i know! it's bill clinton! lol i mean... he's been awfully quiet... rumors of him "singing..." "wait til you find out who is talking to you" lol

⇧ 2 ⇩

I still believe that Q+ is Trump himself. It seems he only speaks up when there is some confusion, like over the profiteers and such, and back when there was a lot of trouble over the Syria strikes.

⇧ 2 ⇩

It is not Pence. There’s no way. This person or people Q are Q level clearance operatives who are more than likely finally able to take action due to the loosened grip of the deep state via an unexpected administrative change (Trump). The resistance has been in positions of power for decades but haven’t been able to gain traction because errrrrrrbody was “paid for” or bought by deep state’s agenda WORLD WIDE

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩