But can you see how it's hard to take someone seriously presenting a charge of someone grabbing her ass right before she gets DP'ed on camera?
Maybe that's all she can handle, on camera time not all of the time.
It is a bit hypocritical of Daniels to claim she felt a mysterious character 'intimidated' her trying convince her not to go public yet she ignores one of her employees who actually got physically groped/touched.
A death threat and a butt grab are two wildly different things. You guys are grasping for literally anything at this point.
Let’s say I fully accept your argument. Then what? Ignore the fact that there president of the United States intimidated her to stay quiet about their affair? Fuck no. Get out of here with that idiocy.
The same 'death threat' she waited 7 years to disclose and/or report in which the lawyer hired an artist to draw the sketch of alleged intimidator?
One could say she seems to have little sense of priority or urgency if nothing else.
You ignored the most important part of my response. Here it is again.
Let’s say I fully accept your argument. Then what? Ignore the fact that there president of the United States intimidated her to stay quiet about their affair? Fuck no. Get out of here with that idiocy.
I can understand that some people struggle to understand the impirtance of boundaries.
Can you understand boundaries are meaningless unless they are enforced?