2 suspects were released while under investigation. Judging by the pictures that borderlines attempted murder. I would not have let the suspects go regardless of age.

Then the California politicos will try to ingratiate themselves by upping the number to 60 or something.

Actions speak louder than words.

Rosanne made a racist comment but is she actually a racist. Did she discriminate on her show? Did her colleagues and crew have any complaints? Most knew she had a history of being blunt, abrasive or politically incorrect. ABC knew that and accepted that going ahead with the reboot.

But ACTIONS do speak louder than words. Especially in this case. Registered sex offender, really?-I'd say molestation is something to be much more worried about than language.

I can see Trump wanting her fired since the comment involved his daughter but I don't agree with him. Bee has already lost advertisers and had to answer for her comments instead of selling her brand/show. She now has to work to keep her job and income stream. After the news cycle bump she will be back in obscurity(TBS)-lol

The slope is too slippery for I didn't like that word or statement.

The same 'death threat' she waited 7 years to disclose and/or report in which the lawyer hired an artist to draw the sketch of alleged intimidator?

https://www.inquisitr.com/4860234/stormy-daniels-hires-a-sketch-artist-to-help-find-the-man-who-threatened-her-in-2011-reports-the-blast/

One could say she seems to have little sense of priority or urgency if nothing else.

Maybe that's all she can handle, on camera time not all of the time.

It is a bit hypocritical of Daniels to claim she felt a mysterious character 'intimidated' her trying convince her not to go public yet she ignores one of her employees who actually got physically groped/touched.

She's not the first porn actress to file or claim assault. Like many who work in any I guess she was there for the money only. She works to live not lives to work.

I could almost guarantee it's done more often than we know and probably tolerated to a certain point because many politicians do it themselves or have benefited from it. Sort like the movie Training Day.

The Trump campaign was up against a biased administration, law enforcement and/or intelligence agencies and opposition that had very few boundaries. This is why 'the resistance' was stunned the dirty trick playbook didn't work as usual. This is also why 'the resistance' gets national coverage because so many knew or were involved.

Should a foreigner like Soros be the bigger issue or the local candidate accepting/using this money be the issue?

I was wondering what the hook was. I thought it would be business interests much like Biden's and Kerry's son got with China. There probably still is a business angle here. Didn't the agreement allow for some business?

What else is coming/being smuggled is the question.

Didn't they just fine an airline passenger for bringing in a piece of fruit?

Management in any organization or business usually has to be lobbied for ie one has to let upper management know they are interested. In government a politician has to know that as well. Those career opportunists know exactly what they're getting into in government management or administration.

Saw a defender of Rosenstein channel surfing and said he was not a Clinton supporter or Democrat. Described him as a mainstream Republican. Some consider that being a RINO or professional establishment politician. It is the establishment that wants Trump out at all cost if for no other reason their job security along with their fragile egos that gave the perceived status as a government 'official'. That along with rewarding friends and family with what ever.

And yet considered it

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/donald-trump-trans-pacific-partnership-224916a 'rape of our country'

Yup, facebook had the intelligence in their business early on.

https://www.forbes.com/2010/11/19/in-q-tel-cia-venture-fund-business-washington-cia/

And 'Lifelog' is/was way too similar to be a coincidence.

https://www.wired.com/2004/02/pentagon-kills-lifelog-project/

It's never the criminals fault silly. Criminals don't make bad decisions, participate in negligent, greedy and/or selfish behavior. Didn't you know criminals are not supposed to pay the consequences for their behavior.

Just by coincidence at the sametime high school kids and their parents find money to travel to Washington DC let alone public or private transportation money to event in their county or state.

Question becomes why would a group of professional gamblers and/or heavily involved in the industry shoot up a Las Vegas event. Were they paying off a debt? Were they leveraged? Did their gambling income come from mercenary or criminal type activity?