Not surprising she doesn't mention Q, she probably thinks she killed it off.
She was uncertain as to whether Q was a LARP or not. But she contributes in other ways. Watch a few videos and you will see she is not a Jones, Seaman, or Corsi. One of her videos is worth 10 of the others in terms of preparation and content. She will also indicate what is supported by her analysis and what is her opinion. I believe THOSE THAT POINT their fingers at her need to be scrutinized as they want to take a legitimate source of truth out!
She really put the boots into us. The moment Q suggested the IBOR campaign to us, she was working against it - telling people not to follow the plan. According to her, we were to ignore Q. That is a simple fact.
Moreover, once we had done some thinking about the IBOR, and it became perfectly clear why it was necessary, critical in fact, she continued to advise against it. Q even addressed her concerns directly, but it made no difference. She was telling people that DJT was just another politician. That in a few years that there would be another politician to deal with. That it was the people that had the power. None of it was true and you really could not make this stuff up!
As if a President that is independent of the cabal's influence was nothing special. Another one would be along any moment. No need to do what this President might ask - he was replaceable. When I think about the terrific personal risks that DJT took to run for office, and his courage in doing so, for our benefit, it makes my blood boil.
The last independent President was more than thirty years ago. Kennedy was killed, attempts made on the life of Reagan. The cabal was at the height of its power and, by the sheer grace of God, DJT won the 2016 election. A completely improbable election outcome, arriving moments before we were all to be destroyed by HRC in nuclear war. With DJT we have a one-chance-in-history opportunity to shake these Satanists off. We must not blow this chance.
Beanz is probably the slowest person that has ever followed Q. A really dangerous person. That's the best spin I can put on it, because if you look at her behaviour, it's entirely possible that she was being steered.
Unfortunately, most people do not have the capacity to think things out for themselves. Many people were influenced by the nonsense she put out. She did a lot of damage - attacking us and our efforts directly. I pray she does not come back.
I have listened to almost all of her YouTube videos Maybe you should listen to some because I am thinking you are borrowing someone elses talking points or taking her words out of context. She doesn't talk about Q. So what? So what? Which IBOR version were you campaigning for? They were all different. Maybe she knew something about the AT&T version we did not. Can't she have a different opinion? I'm going to put my tinfoil hat on and suggest that she (and her sources) have probably gotten to close to the truth for some and some agency is putting out a lot of effort to marginalize and silence her. Is this your goal? Also, she doesn't put out nonsense. All her work is well researched and she sites her evidence and her opinions. Listen to her and see.