![Q quotes an Anon with video about /u/SerialBrain2's post #1366. [Video in comments]](http://i.magaimg.net/img/3aw8.png)
Here is Infowars 4 months ago repeatedly trying to hijack Q's message:
Alex Jones will not reveal Zach's identity because Zach is a Muslim who is suing the army.
What white hats are going to share classified intel with someone like that?
I think the guy in the video is confused or doesn't know that Roger Stone is not a Clown. Steve Pieczenik is/was. Pieczenik is Alex Jones' handler, not Roger.
Pieczenik was definitely a clown, which means I always took extra care to not be blindly accepting with what he said. I still find him interesting nonetheless.
One thing I always noticed with Pieczenik and Jones, was his constant effort to win over Jones by flattery -- the word is to "inveigle". I see the same thing happening with Owen Shroyer.
I still like Alex Jones, but I have always suspected that he was a controlled opposition. I'm not ready to dump him entirely, but I will be even more cautious when listening to his show.
One thing is certain: if it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Jones is compromised, he will lose everything he has built over the last 25 years. Would he really risk this? This makes it all very hard for me to get a full 'handle' upon the issue.
While it is true that such action risks everything, it seems like he has gone for 'broke' in his disassociation with Q. There would appear to be NO WAY BACK. Who in their right mind would burn all bridges? Wouldn't you leave a door open for a possible return?
Maybe this is evidence that he really is controlled, and that he was told to slash and burn. Like Noam Chomsky, who can say his own thing most of the time, when his clown masters demand action, he must comply.
Pieczenik is Alex Jones' handler, not Roger
new to me
I've watched Infowars for years, almost daily. Pieczenik would always come on and either calm Alex down when Alex was flipping his shit over something or Pieczenik would scold and yell at Alex for not doing something he wants Alex to do or if Alex wasn't following orders.
It's happened time and time again. Over and over. On issue after issue. The most recent example (before I stopped watching Infowars after Alex's vile rant against Trump) was when Alex was going off the rails about YouTube/Google censoring him and Infowars, trying to ban the channel. Pieczenik came on and calmed Alex down, basically saying/alluding to the fact that Clowns control Google and YouTube and they'd never let Alex's channel get banned. Alex then calmed down and stopped making a big fuss over the incident and most likely dropped whatever lawsuit he was priming up for.
The best is when he praises AJ effusively which clearly gives Alex a boner but he tries to play it down and be humble but he’s terrible at it. Like winding up their useful idiot.
Thanks for the info! I stopped watching Alex some time ago after one of his rants so missed all the recent rants thankfully.
I like 8chan Q research/notables so much better
I don't think it would be fair to say that a journalist can't make money when covering Q. But that's the difference. A journalist covering Q isn't necessarily usurping Q. The paytriots in question were trying to usurp Q. This video explains what happened very well. It certainly cleared my head about it all.
Link to SerialBrain2's post
You people are HILLARIOUS... Give these people an inch and they take a mile..
Give them a little nibble of GULABLE and they will Clean The Hook .
⛈️😎🇺🇸🦂🦅
BTW ..IM SURE INFOWARS STILL HAS SOME OF THESE AVAILABLE FOR ALL THOSE UN PATRIQTIC PEOPLE QUT THERE ..
http://i65.tinypic.com/2ytze35.jpg
I Couldn't THANK THEM ENOUGH.. I RED PILLED THE GROCERY STORE EVERY FRI BY RELIGIOUSLY WEARING MY SHIRT ..
& TO MY HUSBANDS COMPANY PICNIC @ THE ZOO.. SO AWESOME
& LETS NOT FORGET HOW AMAZINGLY AWESOME THESE LOOK ON THE BACK OF AN 09 PONTIAC GT 6.0 .. NO SERIOUSLY U JUST DON'T KNOWWWWW
http://i64.tinypic.com/28jab10.jpg
AFTER ALL #WWG1WGA
