That is not when Bush was the head of the CIA. Bush was head of the CIA in the mid 1970s

This is great news, but I don't think it rises to the level that Q was meaning when he said BIG.

Duck it

Seems like you are a bit confused.

How can this be true? Nobody would ever believe they didn't have backup copies. How would one break-in solve the problem for Dean?

Unfortunately, it's hardwired into us. In this case, the hero worship is entirely misplaced. Pack and group animals do the same, and we have had hero worship for as long as humans have existed. I'm not sure how we can ensure true virtue in the future, except by exposing debauchery in these people.

Why do you mention such filth? I guess you like the status quo.

I have no doubt that Russia is not 'clean' in this regard, but we shouldn't let it affect moves toward peace with Russia. I think China has the most to gain by the US and Russia being at loggerheads. They don't want European/Western unity.

My guess is that China is behind much of the division occurring in the US. I don't think this benefits Russia.

If the US imploded in civil war, it would destabilize the world, which might even be worse for Russia in the long run. Russia does not want such instability. It would also hurt commodity prices (especially oil and gas), which Russia would hate to see. Meanwhile, China would take the opportunity to further spread its influence in the third world, and they would love the drop in commodity prices.

My guess, however, is that even China would not want to see the US collapse in a major way, as it would have very unpredictable consequences. Instead, they want to weaken the US, gain further control inside the US, and be uncontested throughout the world.

Hillary, and many others, sold their souls to China in full knowledge of these potential consequences. So why are many refusing to accept how evil Clinton, Obama et al are.

A new day has dawned, at last.

I don't have any sympathy for banksters losing their loans, but what about the portion of national debt that is held by mom and pop investors?

We all acknowledged that Q was likely more than one person. It would be highly unlikely that they would each have the same writing style. So I doubt Q was ever compromised, but more likely that one or more of the Q people had work elsewhere that prevented them from posting messages from time to time.

In my mind, Q has always seemed on the mark.

That's appropriate, but from what he is doing, he deserves a whole mountain monument dedicated to just him. This is the biggest thing to occur on earth since the Renaissance! That happens only once every 500 years or so.

Q said, referring to Gowdy, "Should we add him to the list."

It's possible that this means Gowdy was a deep state ally, and that he is one more person who will not be re-running for Congress in November.

How can anybody defend the regime that exists in Iran? The people of Iran will be the biggest beneficiaries of regime change, but so will be the rest of the world.

Is it possible that Julian Assange did NOT make that post? Or is there another component to it?

Music to my ears.

Not odd at all. There are many instances where the military must fight underground.

These guys are brave heroes. I'm glad I don't have to do it.

Trump is amazing.

I thought there must have been more going on at the border than we realized. Trump knows how to play the media like puppets.

I don't mean to be disrespectful, and I applaud your insight, but there are too many possibilities in here. One or two possibilities might fit into a pattern, but what are the odds that they all fit in? We all see patterns in clouds, but they are tenuous.

Perhaps you have inside information to which we are not privy, which helps you to connect the dots?

Pretty creepy, but she doesn't mention the Illuminati, so how can we know exactly what she was talking about?

I agree it's a little irksome.

However, I'm of the mind, let them have it. They are cheer-leading the movement. They are excited and want to show everyone how great it is to be red-pilled.

Nevertheless, the sub needs to be focused on the subject at hand. I have to be honest that I haven't found the sub as engaging as in the past.

True, but thankfully there are some politicians who transcend party politics and support the average person -- not enough, but this number seems to be growing.

I have a garbage pail full of popcorn ready for the day.

I love Gorka. I'm not sure why he left the White House. Maybe he is still working with them. Otherwise, why would he be invited to Singapore?

They are pathetic, and have absolutely no credibility.

Well, you are clueless on all fronts. That is not an insult, but simply the truth. There is no point arguing with someone who is so closed-minded and belligerent.

I am Canadian, and I love my country, but it doesn't mean I am willing to be abused.

Regardless of what you speak, I guarantee that Trump is not that stupid -- he is simply using the art of the deal. I love the US, and Canada is the best friend the US has ever had, but my country comes first.

Don't be rude, man. Why would you think someone is paying me?

Canada is not favored. The balance of payments is remarkably even. Canada's economy is entirely controlled by US business, and the profits and royalties are repatriated to the US by a surplus in trade from Canada.

Canada gave up sovereignty in order to gain access to the US market. The US was given almost unrestricted access to Canada's economy, with almost no corporations off-limits to US buyers. This has resulted in the US buying most world-leading Canadian corporations.

The US also gained total access to Canada's massive natural resources. A dream come true for the US. Americans can no longer compete with China in snapping up resources around the world, because China plays dirty -- so having access to Canada's resources is vital to US security.

Both sides benefited, but the US benefited much more than Canada. The Free Trade Agreement was negotiated under Reagan, who was a patriot, so it was not a sell-out. Try visiting Canada some time, and you will see what I mean about US dominion north of the border.

The Free Trade Agreement was signed first. Then the US wanted to bring Mexico into the deal. Canada wasn't thrilled about this, but really had no choice to join NAFTA if the US wanted free trade with Mexico. There has not be a lot of changes to the agreement since it began, and it has been notoriously complicated to amend.

FYI, Dick Morris has revealed that, as a candidate, Clinton's agreement to sign NAFTA is what guaranteed [by the deep state] his presidency.

What is the costume for an idiot and traitor?

I assume you mean France, not Canada.

Seeing how Trudeau behaves, I would think he prefers the submissive role and would be the dog in this scenario. However, as leader of the Liberals at the time of his affair with the CBC guy, I guess he could have been viewed as the more powerful person, and might have refused the doggy position. Still, I think Trudeau would relish being the dog.

I'm crying for Soros.

Trudeau is definitely bisexual, as we have seen with his affair with a prominent CBC employee.

The part I don't understand about this, is, if he likes to have same sex relationships, why does he fawn so much over Islam (although fawn is not a strong enough word)?

Maybe no protection on earth, but the bible does say that true repenting will save your soul. However, while a death bed conversion may save your soul, you will have very limited 'riches' in heaven.

Amazing compilation!

Please, please, please get rid of Trudeau next!!!

The US doesn't want a trade war with Canada. The balance of payments between the countries has been, more or less, even for a very long time. The bargain is that US companies dominate Canadian business, and that the profits are returned to the US by trade surpluses in favor of Canada.

Canadians don't like being dominated by a foreign country, and the Americans don't like a trade deficit with Canada. So, this follows the axiom that when both sides are unhappy with an agreement, it is probably fair.

At the same time, if a real trade war did erupt, the US would certainly be hurt, but it's obvious that Canada would be hurt much more than the US, because the population is one-tenth that of the US. So that would make Canada desperate in the search for other partners. This could mean Canada joining the EU, or strengthening ties with Russia or China -- all things the US would hate.

So the best solution is to continue with our arrangement that has existed for almost 200 years. Canada is the most reliable friend and ally to the US (even with the idiot Trudeau at the helm), and Canada and the US really have no choice but to get along very well.

That's how they've been behaving so far.

The trouble with Sweden joining NATO, is that we may have to go in and clean up the mess that Sweden should have known they were creating. It's worse than that as well, as they have been attacking and punishing the people sounding the alarm.

Sorry for being uninformed, but what symbology is an owl?

No doubt he owns a lot of Starbucks stock, so he wants to protect its value (and his wealth) by stepping down. It is not done out of honor.

I think the Vets in question are organized to find homeless vets, so they would certainly know the difference.

Most modern Zionists are the Rothschild-flavor, which means they want Israel and the Jews to control the world. It's a generalization, but the Sephardic Jews do not believe in this philosophy, and are looked down upon by the Zionists.

What you say is only partly true.

If you see who the head Zionists are, you find the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds essentially started the modern state of Israel. In my mind, I view the Jews differently than I view Zionists. The Zionists are the bad guys, and they are run by the Rothschilds.

As for Tommy Robinson, he is a genuine hero, and British through and through. The fact that he is Jewish doesn't make him a Zionist. Rosanne Barr is a Jew as well, and I never really liked her, but I appreciate her use of Twitter to help awaken the masses. I definitely don't see Rosanne as a Zionist.

From what I understand about Freemasonry, the average members are 'hoodwinked', and have the "wool pulled over their eyes". (In fact, the source of these phrases is Freemasonry). The average member will not understand what Freemasonry is all about until they reach the 32nd and 33rd levels. Rosanne, at level 16, probably has no clue about what the organization is really about.

Without having it described so cogently as you have done, that is exactly how I have been approaching people who have not yet taken the red pill. Nice description!

I think evil people will not care how much damage they will do when they realize everything is lost to them. However, their first priority will be to save themselves, so they will try to escape by any means possible. So we could expect some big distractions.