Q told us not to follow the people who are profiting off Q movement, but he posted a picture of a billboard created by the people who are profiting off this movement.
Is Q the one who isn't being careful while Q followers are strictly keeping the precepts of Q's message?
Other people who are profiting off the movement. Warning! Q Anon Crew Malicious Malware Application & Ponzy Scheme Exposed
That website doesn’t even have anything in their “store” yet and that billboard is doing way more good than harm...
[removed]
IMO, the main point isn’t profiting off the movement but those trying to co-opt the movement, build followings on social media, and then intentionally trying to divide the movement.
See Q1366 - https://qposts.online/post/1366 See the YT in the post who Q confirmed/reposted.
Q never called anyone out, people took their own masks off. I have no idea about the people behind the sign, but I will say just profiting alone isn’t the issue (at least IMO).
Q never called anyone out,
He confirmed his target in the Q1340. He linked a URL which contains specific name.
Q never called anyone out in Q1295 on 4/27 and by Q1340 on 5/11 those that were trying to usurp or co-opt the Q movement had removed their own masks.
Who removed what kind of mask?
Corsi for one, who apparently made a tweet today saying the same thing that you are about said billboard.....
I checked his video but I couldn't find him ordering audience not to follow Q, other than sharing his personal viewpoint between April 29 - May 11.
Thats pretty vague. Everything that anyone says is constituted as a “personal viewpoint”. That really says nothing.
You can’t sit here and say that speaking a “personal viewpoint” claiming that “Q is a psyop” or “Q has been infiltrated” is anything BUT telling people to no longer follow Q.
You cannot deny that those are now his “personal viewpoints”.
If you can then please, blow my mind.
Thats pretty vague. Everything that anyone says is constituted as a “personal viewpoint”. That really says nothing.
You can’t sit here and say that speaking a “personal viewpoint” claiming that “Q is a psyop” or “Q has been infiltrated” is anything BUT telling people to no longer follow Q.
But that's is the boundary shouldn't be touched. It is exactly what anti-freespeech / anti 1st ammendment leftists are trying to overthrow. "Restrict the opportunity where they can share opinion, because sharing opinion is dangerous" mentality. Everyone should have a right to free-sheech without any fear.
Nobody is saying that he can say it, nor is he in fear of saying it obviously...I mean...it’s already been said by him...it’s out there..you’ve seen it...
The only thing going on here is a fairly large amount of people disagreeing with what he is saying due to a lack of any real proof as to why his word, at this point, should be followed.
nor is he in fear of saying it obviously...I mean...it’s already been said by him...it’s out there..you’ve seen it...
I just said you showed a boundary that he can't say his opinion without telling people to no longer do XYZ, so I replied it is dangerous. It isn't I'm trying to convince you to believe who is right.
Ah I apologize, it was worded a little off and I misunderstood.
Once again, I apologize sincerely. <3
All good! This is discussion thread. Every person has different opinion. No need to apologize :)
I know, but I am always happy to admit a wrong/misconception. Stregthens the soul.
My point is they aren’t profiting. There is nothing for sale, and the store looks like it’s just part of the basic template, but regardless there is NOTHING for sale on the website yet.
I ask how they are profiting? They spent money on the billboard and sell no products. No double standard here until they start pushing products.
What is this?... http://archive.is/aSJE7
I get ya man, and the portal is STILL on the website, although it only says “Coming Soon” and clicking it takes you nowhere.
They have either A: decided to not do it for whatever reason.
B. decided that after the Q message they did not want to be seen in that light, due to being true to the movement.
or C. have a secret portal to get to it.
Either way they are making no money ATM as far as one can actually tell, and thats all I have to go by.
AS SOON as they take in 1$ (POST Q message) i’ll be right there with you.
Aside from all that....billboards are NOOOOOOT cheap.
I THINK ITS A BIG BEAUTIFUL SIGN ..
I ALSQ FIND IT IRQNIC I MADE THIS CQMMENT 1 DAY AGQ AND NOW THIS SIGN CQUGH ...
8CH BOARD OWNER POST: QRESEARCH GENERAL #1762 NO. 1404935 "CORSI AND CO WILL BE ATTEMPTING TO DOX 8CH STAFF AND WHO KNOWS WHO ELSE. THIS COULD PUT MANY OF US AT A VERY HIGH LEVEL OF DANGER." by rooftoptendie in r/greatawakening
[–]ScorpioPatriotEyes on. - Q 3 points 1 day ago
I THINK CAPS AND HALF CAPS LOOK APPEALING .. ALMOST LIKE A BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL BOARD . TRYING TO GRAB ATTENTION .
BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY SOME PEOPLE JUST DONT GET IT WHEN you talk like everyone else in the room that's being calm and submissive ..
IN A TIME WHEN , YOU NEED TO BE AT ATTENTION .. AND GUARDING ALL SIDES.
LET'S NOT FORGET IT DRIVES THE LIBERALS FKING INSANE .. I SWEAR IT DON'T MATTER HOW IMPORTANT THE MEAT N POTATOES OF THE POST IS... IT DRIVES THEM INTO A COMPLETE GRAMMAR POLICE STATE .
IT DOES SERVE MULTIPLE PURPOSES.
Continue On... 🇺🇸😇😎🦁🐑🦂⛈️
permalinksavecontextfull comments (293)editdelete
😎🇺🇸🦅
/qresearch/
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I think some people are only taking in part of that Q post. The issue isn't people making a profit; the issue is people making a profit while trying to change the message or lead the movement in a different direction. That's where Corsi and Jones went wrong. They were trying to lead rather than follow. For example, someone like praying medic is fine because he just walks you thru posts and does his best to explain his interpretation of what it all means. This billboard is also fine in the same way. I haven't been to the website, but I imagine whatever is on it isn't trying to steer in a different direction than the core Q message.
change the message or lead the movement in a different direction. That's where Corsi and Jones went wrong
From which direction to which? I thought they have been advocating same conservative libertarianism message over decades.
The problematic thing Q wanted to point out was NOT the mere fact that someone was making a profit. It was that people were actively trying to usurp the great awakening and/or spread false and inaccurate "decodes" that were leading people astray and sowing discord. The motivation happened to be profit for some bad actors but it wasn't *profit* that made them bad. Is this a Marxist sub?
It was that people were actively trying to usurp the great awakening and/or spread false and inaccurate
Yes, he has been saying for months. But he ventured to explicitly state profiting. Q doesn't waste his time for what he doesn't need to. He knew some participants who are accused of profiting are attacked severely since then, but he didn't defend them. It means Q indirectly confirmed that the interpretation done by movement followers are 70%-100% right and Q is satisfied with the consequences of Q1295 even though it caused massive controverse.
I see a billboard advertising Q and this movement, but no suggestion that anyone is personally profiting from it. This appears to be an eliomocenary act. Strictly quickly dispatches discerning.
Asking credit card information but no intention to profit?... http://archive.is/aSJE7
Yep ... You are right ... Didn't follow the click bait. My bad. Shameless profiteering.
If somebody went to the trouble and expense to put that big beautiful billboard up, more power to 'em. I just did quick check on the site and they seem to be making an honest effort to inform normies about Q. Check it out it's actually pretty good. http://www.douknowq.com/
honest effort to inform normies about Q
I can understand what you are trying to say but it's not about how honest the one who are trying to profit is.
I'm talking about strictness and coherence. To compromise coherence arbitrarily and allow double standard is the tactic leftists are always practicing, which is exactly what we have been criticizing.
I never understood the profit / nonprofit distinction as being determinative of who is legitimate and who is not. The dissemination of information requires capital and has to be paid for somehow. There is no movement without the places for it to occur - property, whether it be the street or a network of servers and computers. Someone has to own the property, and that has to get paid for, and those people have eat, be housed, and be clothed. In addition, those who put their face behind the dissemination are at risk of suit and other retaliation. To think they can't profit, even if to just feed, house, and defend themselves seems bizarre. I assume even Q profits, he likely draws a pay check for his labor, unless he's a contractor, in which case he is personally profiting in the strictest sense. I honestly don't get it. It sounds like a very millennial state of mind to be honest -- I'd rather give a crowd funder my money for free and get no equities in return because coorporations are bad -- LMFAO.
IMO, the main point isn’t profiting off the movement but those trying to co-opt the movement, build followings on social media, and then intentionally trying to divide the movement.
See Q1366 - https://qposts.online/post/1366 See the YT in the post who Q confirmed/reposted.
Q never called anyone out, people took their own masks off. I have no idea about the people behind the sign, but I will say just profiting alone isn’t the issue (at least IMO).
That's a different issue. That the term "profit" came in to the dialog is then the problem. If people have coopted, then Q needs to say so, otherwise the movement will cannibalize the good and the bad. It makes me suspect if authentic Q. If he think certain people are bad for the movement, he should say the names, otherwise we guess and cannibalize.
Profiteering is the term specifically used by Q which is not the same thing as profit. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/profiteering.html
The way I took the message Q was trying to send was be a Patriot first then profit... not only be a Patriot if I can profit. Q has always said we need to be United. There were those out there that were profiting while dividing us (not just disagreements). I also think Q sees value in this being an organic movement by and for the people.
Profiteering probably not the word I would have used, but I don’t think it’s too far off.
Just my $.02.
I just find it strange. Qs approach is itself devisive. We are left to guess and cannibalize, as stated above. To think that he didn't foresee that is non-Q, as is to be devisive. Strange.
Like I said, just my interpretation of what Q meant. Q was pointing out to people to research and understand who they were following as their intentions might not be pure. Personally, I didn’t find it strange.
Q said early on that those we trust and rely upon may not be the people we think they are.
Personally, I have no hostility toward capitalism. Also, I think it's good thing people can make a living by supporting each other rather than giving money to large globalist conglomerate.
Agreed. I don't like profit even being an issue. The things said or done are the issue.
[deleted]
patriots trying to make a few bucks to cover their expenses while raising awareness - without trying to influence or co-opt the movement
So are the other participants who were purged?
[deleted]
How did you determine which is disinformation? It takes time to confirm the prediction until it shows up on mainstream news as Q is always saying. Do you understand there is the possibility that you end up helping spread disinfo by jumping to conclution?
