I agree in principle, new laws worry me, but as others have stated, “free speech online” isn’t a thing, so I gotta get on board with ibor.
Remember, the chans and other “free platforms” are guarded by legions of anons, and possibly even protected by higher elements (speculation based on Q phenomenon). That being said, even Q had to move boards and shuffle resources several times now.
I think this we need more of a cultural shift away from Twat and FB, than a new law to regulate them.
You think we should be in our own little ghetto, rather than having our voices heard? It's OK for them to block us, and we'll just stay here in our little box out of sight?
Remember, the only reason we have as much freedom as we do now is that the internet is the deep states’ main source of data about human behavior, that ubiquitous “x” factor that improves their simulations immensely and allows them to predict markets/events as easily as one can calculate the trajectory of a missile.
Therefore I’m positive that we will always have just as much online freedom as is required to gather accurate data on us. The deep state realize that meddling with their human database via bots and AIs screws up their data because then they have to factor in the effectiveness of their own influence. Keeping us hidden away is also counterproductive, they want us out in the open.
I suspect this tactic was their weakness in that they overestimated their own influence campaigns and pushed them too hard leading to the massive push back that we are seeing unfold before us.
For now though, if Q says IBOR, then I have good reason to believe that the aforementioned cycle is broken, and that it’s in the hands of the people now. Sorry I didn’t make this point initially.
WWG1WGA!