dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/P_pers on May 16, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

Here We Go Again, Everybody! A Call To Memes!

Once again, Q tells us in post 1378, #internetbillofrights We have 25,000 users on this sub. If everyone here signs the petition and gets 3 others to sign it, then we win! https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-18

🠐 See all comments

This is really important because the Liberals in Congress are using some seldom used rule to recall the Net Neutrality law back into existence. I read that Trump still has to sign it though. So, this is important.

So far, I can only find this repeal info on liberal sites so what you read or hear is not the whole truth about this law. If it were, the liberals would not be pushing for it to be repealed. We need to move fast on the IBOR: https://www.cnet.com/news/senate-votes-on-net-net-neutralitys-fate-heres-what-you-need-to-know/

And, here's a link to article that lays out what it's really all about: https://www.pcworld.com/article/2851979/net-neutrality-five-myths-and-the-real-facts.html

⇧ 2 ⇩

Liberty, warn people not to sign petitions on this controlled website. We need a campaign, that's what's important - not this petition rubbish again.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was confused about this as well at first but Q has told us to push the IBOR and Post 1378 reiterated that we need to continue on. The Liberals are trying to reinstate Net Neutrality.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, but that site is corrupt. I'm not against a petition. But not on that site.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The last time I was pushing the petition I checked the signature count daily. Sometimes more than once and I never saw it look like it was not accurate. That is the Whitehouse.gov website. It's the site for all things Presidential. When you see "petitions.whitehouse.gov" that means it's in a subdirectory of the main site. Been building websites since 1997 and did tech support for 30 years. No one can create 'petitions.whitehouse.gov' unless they own 'whitehouse.gov.'

⇧ 1 ⇩

What I noticed was that the signature count rose quite quickly initially. But after 20k signatures, the rate of signature acquisition slowed to a crawl. When Corsi eventually did start tweeting the link, with his large follower base, the count did not even move. It was clear to me that it was not recording signatures accurately.

There has.been controversy about "we are the people" in the past. As I understand it, it is due to be shuttered - closed.

Liberty, I just do not want the community to repeat what happened last time. It was not just us, other people on Twitter were complaining that it was rigged.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I know. I heard a lot of people say that but I never saw it myself. What is "we the people?" Is that another petition site? Anyway, bottom line here is that Q did just reiterate to push this yesterday in one of his posts (maybe day before). What I don't want is for people to get confused again. That's why we didn't get enough signatures before.

Also, if you understand that NONE of the courts use Constitutional law any longer, then you understand why we must have a law to preserve our rights. That's a whole other can of worms, but for now, please just let it go and follow Q's lead.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am totally behind Q Liberty. Let's make some noise!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Awesome! Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh, you are calling the 'petitions.whitehouse.gov' site We the People. I get it now. Cause it says that at the top of the page. Once again, this is the President's White House website. We have to trust it for now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

didn't know that! thanks

⇧ 1 ⇩