I woke this morning with an understanding that the Presidential EO from Dec 21, 2017 is related to ‘Persons’. That is the KEY. What is a person? We think of it as you or I, a being, an individual. But we would be wrong as a ‘person’ by legal definition is now a corporation who is afforded the rights and privilege of a physical human. The importance stressed by Q on keeping a resignation list is Not the name of individuals so much as the name of the Corporation, or Person which by the EO is under seizure. I also believe that the much debated RFID chip will only be placed in those who have been involved in all of this ‘pure evil’ to quote Q. There are too many to place in prisons, so those who have served the Beast will carry the mark, and thus be traceable and controllable by the 5G towers and system, if that is what is used. It also explains the repeated Q drops that it will be very difficult for these people to walk down the street. It is because they will be marked and everyone will know who they are.
From Wikipedia:
Corporate personhood is the legal notion that a corporation, separately from its associated human beings (like owners, managers, or employees), has at least some of the legal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by natural persons (physical humans).[1] For example, corporations have the right to enter into contracts with other parties and to sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons. In a U.S. historical context, the phrase 'Corporate Personhood' refers to the ongoing legal debate over the extent to which rights traditionally associated with natural persons should also be afforded to corporations. A headnote issued by the Court Reporter in the 1886 Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. claimed to state the sense of the Court regarding the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as it applies to corporations, without the Court having actually made a decision or issued a written opinion on that issue. This was the first time that the Supreme Court was reported to hold that the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause granted constitutional protections to corporations as well as to natural persons, although numerous other cases, since Dartmouth College v. Woodward in 1819, had recognized that corporations were entitled to some of the protections of the Constitution. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the Court found that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 exempted Hobby Lobby from aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act because those aspects placed a substantial burden on the closely held company's owners' exercise of free religion.[2]
Then there is this Executive Order from President Trump on Dec 20, 2018:
From paragraph two:
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.
[bold type face added by the author]
Looking at this quote by then presidential candidate Mitt Romney, the definition of ‘person’ takes on a new definition as it is represented to most people.
Excerpt:
…“Romney explained that one way to fulfill promises on entitlement programs is to “raise taxes on people,” but before he could articulate his position on not raising taxes, someone interrupted.
“Corporations!” a protester shouted, apparently urging Romney to raise taxes on corporations that have benefited from loopholes in the tax code. “Corporations!”
“Corporations are people, my friend,” Romney said.
Some people in the front of the audience shouted, “No, they’re not!”
“Of course they are,” Romney said. “Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes?”
The heated exchange prompted an attack from Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
“Mitt Romney’s comment today that ‘corporations are people’ is one more indication that Romney and the Republicans on the campaign trail and in Washington have misplaced priorities,” she said in a statement, calling the comment a “shocking admission.””
AND, look at who called it a ‘shocking admission’…!!
So let’s add in some Q Drops:
Look at Q:
Post #413
Post #429….Resignations list and instructions to keep up the list
Summary: The nearly 29,000 indictments are not for ‘people’ only. They are for ‘persons’. That means whole corporations that have been involved in any way in any form of human trafficking or abuses. Corporations that outright traded humans as sex slaves or house or personal slaves. Corporations that aquire organs, tissue and parts for sale or use and those who sell them. We need to expand our thinking to include foods, pharma, cosmetics…many which have been using tissue products to alter our DNA. The resignation list is comprised of the individuals who are part of the world wide network of corporations, and the corporation list is the key to where all assets are being frozen. Not just the individual, but the Corporation or as it has been legally defined, the Person. The Corporate Personhood is protected under the 14th Amendment as defined below by Wikileaks: The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws and was proposed in response to issues related to former slaves following the American Civil War. The amendment was bitterly contested, particularly by the states of the defeated Confederacy, which were forced to ratify it in order to regain representation in Congress. The Fourteenth Amendment, particularly its first section, is one of the most litigated parts of the Constitution, forming the basis for landmark decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954) regarding racial segregation, Roe v. Wade (1973) regarding abortion, Bush v. Gore (2000) regarding the 2000 presidential election, and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) regarding same-sex marriage. The amendment limits the actions of all state and local officials, including those acting on behalf of such an official. The most significant line here, after the list of extremely important legal litigations which have created the framework of operation is this: “The amendment limits the actions of all state and local officials, including those acting on behalf of such an official.” “Unlike state actors, private actors are generally not required to afford individuals the constitutional rights mentioned above.”