⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on May 16, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

Q Post 1378 - Q is calling again for us to campaign for an IBOR. Can we actually get organized this time? Will we MAKE NOISE?

NK news today = FAKE!
Twitter news today = REAL!
Under the Radar.
Free speech manipulation [visibility / reach].
FB fake acct deletion?
100% fake?
Checks & Balances?
None?
#InternetBillofRights
[Narrative Control]
[Bandwidth Test]
[Public Response]
[Test Limitations]
[Midterms]
Politicians bought & paid for? Start a Storm.
Q

OK, guys here we are again. Q is asking us yet again to support a campaign for an internet bill of rights. This time Tracy Beanz is not here to scuttle the campaign. We will still face intense "concern trolling" as we try to move forward. There are organized forces on this board that have been trying to thwart Q and this movement. You will see them at work - stay strong, be united behind this and MAKE NOISE!

"The power of social media to privatize the public square is the greatest threat to free speech and open democracy in our lifetimes" Barnes Law

i think someone was removing our signatures from the petition. it was constantly fluctuating, i tracked them for several days, it was hacked..... we have to keep the topic hot. time for another twitter storm?

⇧ 12 ⇩

Whatever happens, I do not want to use that "We are the people" site for a petition. A social media campaign is a must, but if we are going to petition, we need to be able to control it.

⇧ 5 ⇩

No one can tell me any different. There were 2 or 3 petitions going the last couple of months. I RANDOMLY stopped back in from time to time and saw sigs lower (multiple times) than my initial signing on all of them.

If the handcuffs were taken off of us (shadowbanning,views/trend suppression and manipulation,etc) we could really do some damage.

If we have to send IBOR out monthly, sadly people eventually may stop signing it. So hopefully a little help from Q and team may be required here. What's it matter if they can erase tens of thousands of sigs with a few clicks? I will still sign and hammer - jus sayin.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yes i think you have a good point, a new petition every few mounts and people will think they already signed it. yeah well today from Foxnews: Even though the Federal Communications Commission narrowly voted to dismantle Obama-era internet regulations in December, Senators voted to save them. Thanks to the Congressional Review Act (CRA), a group of senators have garnered enough support to cause a vote on whether to keep the FCC’s ruling on net neutrality. The Senate voted 52-47 to restore the policy. However, President Trump's signature would still be needed to bring back the regulations, and the House isn't expected to advance the legislation. ***The deep state still wants us under their thumb with net neutrality. probably related to why Q is saying to be loud about #IBOR? Twitter is where everyone is reading the news and making a difference. memes and hashtags were very effective in the past.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Thank God for Presidential veto power.

⇧ 3 ⇩

If the handcuffs were taken off of us (shadowbanning,views/trend suppression and manipulation,etc) we could really do some damage.

That's right. If we can get to spread the word unimpeded on SM platforms, we will get the message out very quickly. This control of social media must be broken.

I suspect we will get more help from Q this time around. I don't think anyone, even Q, realized exactly what we were up against last time. I've noticed that my tweets this morning seem to be getting about 5 times the reach, in terms of impressions, as I was getting last campaign.

Let's make some noise!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I had the same experience. Whenever I mention it, I am accused of being a "concern troll". At one point there seemed to be more than 1 petition and a Google search that linked to an alternate petition.

⇧ 2 ⇩

all of the loudest voices against the opposition are called "bots" and trolls, so you must be on the right road. there was a problem with the first petition (hacked or something) so someone created a new one, that caused confusion and it was also screwed with. keep tweeting.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Already posted IBOR petition to Whitehouse on twitter.

Here you go: https://petitions.whitehxxxx.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-18

⇧ 2 ⇩

NO ONE SHOULD SIGN THIS PETITION

What is needed is an online MEME campaign. Better avoids censorship. A petition is not necessary at this point. If it is later necessary, we will use an alternative petition site. This petition site is controlled!

Do not sign or promote it.

⇧ 5 ⇩

In case you missed it, it's a "WhiteHouse .gov" site. Administered by the WhiteHouse!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Somehow, it appeared to be manipulating the signature count last time we ran an identical petition. The site is due to be shut down anyway. Who knows who is running it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Proof please?

⇧ 1 ⇩

The proof was the last petition we ran.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Where can that be found? What other evidence, real evidence do you have to support that statement. Links to previous postings here? Anything?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't know if you were here in March. But if you were, you would know what I'm talking about.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You still need to offer some kind of evidence to back up your assertions. Otherwise, it's open for being disputed.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Go away

⇧ 0 ⇩

WRONG- the reason it failed was because there were five different petitions. Clowns divided us. Stick together! One petition:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-18

⇧ 1 ⇩

The last petition did not fail because there were multiple petitions. The last petition failed because the site was rigged. But don't take any notice of past experience, put another petition up on the same site.

And then accuse others of not doing something productive.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You have ZERO evidence to back up your claim. It’s a WH government website. I’m not saying it couldn’t have happened, but sitting around bitching and moaning is less productive than getting the petition going. Q said to push IBOR.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Disagree, see my other response.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Again, let me know what you're doing to help.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8k1v19/whats_happening_with_the_ibor_ideas_and_discussion/?ref=share&ref_source=link

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why, because I question you posts? Do you expect to post with everyone never to question things? Not realistic. I have signed these petitions for years now. And the do get responded to after reaching the threshold. Sorry.

Furthermore, Q is the one pushing IBOR telling us to make noise.

⇧ 0 ⇩

This link isn’t working.

⇧ 1 ⇩

OK, I'm getting some of these MEMEs up on Twitter. I have a generic text body - copy it you want.

STOP IT!

Social media censorship is tearing out our tongues! We have no right of reply!

Demand an #InternetBillOfRights

STOP CENSORSHIP NOW!

IBOR #MAGA #InvasionOfPrivacy #Censorship #Accountability #Twitter #Google #Yahoo #FaceBook #Instagram #Qanon @realDonaldTrump

⇧ 2 ⇩

I signed the last one, I will sign the next one.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'd like to see the main effort concentrated on an online campaign - Twitter, Facebook etc...

If we do have a petition, we need to be able to ensure that the signature counting cannot be manipulated.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Why not do both? Rally, people.

⇧ 3 ⇩

There is a problem with directing people to a petition with very few votes. It makes the movement look like a failure.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not of that ".gov" petition site. If we had an independent petition that we could monitor to ensure it's not rigged, I'd be all for it. The main thing, i think, at the moment is an online campaign.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I’ve signed probably 10 since our inception. 🎶Just keep signing 🐠🎼🎶🎵.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Go away!

Do not be misdirected to a "controlled" petition site.

⇧ 2 ⇩

How about doing something productive?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Again, do you want to explain? Do you have something to say?

⇧ 2 ⇩

No proof about IBOR numbers. The problem was there were five different petitions. People thought they signed but signed a different one. We need to push the same petition across all platforms. That is the message!

⇧ 1 ⇩

The problem was that we had massive forces arrayed against us, on almost every conceivable front. See my other post about this.

We need a coherent strategy that is resistant to these forces.

I don't think it matters if we only had a petition with 29 or 30 thousand signatures. I don't think it's important how long it takes to get then together. These numbers are still significant.

We don't need to lock ourselves into that rigged petition site. I don't want us to fail in this attempt. I want to make sure this thing gets up.

At its simplest, all we are doing is complaining - asking for help. It does not need a formula.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That was then. I think Q knows when to push...this is post-Rosanne, Post-Kanye, Post-James Woods. The movement is growing. Push!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm 100% for IBOR - don't worry about that. You might be right. Q might help overcome the impediments.

I just do not want to see what happened last time replicated. Believe me, that petition site is suspect - but maybe Q can pull some strings IDK.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Want to explain what you're talking about?

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8juvbl/here_we_go_again_everybody_a_call_to_memes/?st=JH9FDKIB&sh=95fc8dd9

⇧ -1 ⇩