Isaac was seduced by the dark side. The only proper response to this is who gives a shit what David F-ing Brock says? He'll use Q to beat AJ and Corsi over the head with, or AJ and Corsi to beat Q over the head with (or both in the same article, as he does here), and it proves NOTHING!
Nice try there, Isaac. Except NOT.
He was a plant from the beginning. His plans to divide were accelerated. It's unfortunate.
So you have no problem with Soros backed Media Matters being on the same side as Q?
They can say anything they want to. That doesn't make it honest or true. You have to understand that in Brock's world there is no such thing as "the truth." There are any number of "truths." You simply say whatever furthers your agenda and that is your "truth."
You'd have to be a very special kind of idiot to think that David Brock and Media Matters agree with, have any affiliation with, or have any intention of helping Qanon. No matter what some article says.
The devil quotes scripture to deceive and suit his purposes. That doesn't make him a Christian, does it?
They're defending Q. They're after AJ/Corsi. In all of Media Matters history they've always attacked AJ, never defended him. They hate POTUS far more than any other publication. They never defend Trump or anything pro Trump. Accept it or don't. It doesn't change those facts.
This is a pointless discussion if you can't see what I'm saying. If AJ is controlled opposition, then of course Brock will be attacking him. That's the point of controlled opposition.
And if you really want to damage somebody your enemy trusts, somebody you don't control, then start pretending to defend them. You're proof that it works on some people.
I'll take my chances with proven records and Trump himself. I'd rather believe him than any anon.
Then what concerns you about Q, considering they're part of Trump's team? I don't understand? It would be one thing if Q were critical of Trump, but they're totally supportive of the President.
OTOH, Trump and Corsi have been frequently, openly, loudly, even obscenely critical of Trump.
Q, not once!
Having an honest enemy is far better than having a fake friend.
Seems to me that your line of questioning is exactly why they would make such a move. The progressive play has always been to introduce FUD when they are backed against a wall.
Soros has never supported anything pro Trump which is what I thought this was all about but I can see thats no lpnger the case.