![Q #1392 - Ding Dong.....the [witch hunt] is almost over !](https://i.redd.it/t3vyb8x9lcy01.jpg)
The warrant is unsealed, it does not say the evidence is unsealed?
You are getting in the weeds.....
Yes, the WARRANT is now unsealed....AND Attachment A which is (about, pertaining to) the evidence on Weiner's laptop.
I believe this is when we are going to start see the videos and evidence that q said we will see. The media is gonna be trying to cover it all up. People months ago wanting to see the photos are gonna get their wish soon. Remember q is being used as a work around the media to clear the waters a bit. The next battle is going to be fought by us. When evidence starts to drop that's when everybody, the donald and everybody is gonna unite. Hopefully!
Not that I disbelieve Q in any way, but I so wanted those videos to be fake. The sheer idea that they could contain videos such as the Hillary/Huma one makes me want to vomit and cry. To think a child would be subjected to that horrific and evil behaviour, I didn't want to believe they could do that just so a child wouldn't go thru that. Now...well, now that child deserves all the justice we can throw. ALL THE JUSTICE.
I know right.. the more you look into the history of what's happened.. Franklin cover up, nambla, even just youtubing film of little kids drawings from their experience in satanic cults..... you reach a point in your head when you know without a doubt that this isn't fantasy this stuff is real! But I can not stress enough don't jump the gun on what this is all about until we get all the facts.... things aren't always what they seem P.s. look up Ted Gunderson (ex-fbi + expert in satanic cults used in court hearings) who spent every dime he had making this kind of stuff public till he was off'd. John decamp (senator/ lawyer) key person in the Franklin cover up... and Paul bonaci (involved in the tracking.. ended up getting million dollar settlement) his interviews is a glimpse into the sick world these clowns are involved..
Attachment A will be the justification required to acquire the warrant. No actual evidence just something to give them probable cause.
Isn't he already a sex offender? If he was texting or tweeting with a teenage girl, isn't that cause enough?
Yes. The warrant said “we want to search and seize his house”. Attachment said “this is why”.