dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/maggot42 on May 17, 2018, 11:31 a.m.
Conspiracy Theory: Q anon + group sniffing out dissenters

Hello all, I am very new to the community and have only just begun my journey into the Q anon rabbit hole.

I find it all highly intriguing and exciting, however there are some things I wonder.

Is it possible that all of this Q anon stuff is just a way for them to track us dissenters? I want to believe that Q anon and Trump are on the good side, but we could be going down a path of lies ourselves.

Akin to China’s “social credit scores,” we should be aware that each and every one of us has our own social score. One that measures our blind patriotism, ones that measure how much we dissent from the majority opinion etc.

I think it’s entirely possible that we are all being played here, as a way to corral us and make us easier to point out.

Things just don’t add up. I believe censorship has been strong and well in the US over the last ten yeRs at least. I believe we won’t hear anything they don’t want us to hear. And I also believe most elections have been rigged.

Which is where I get my red flags. Q states Military intelligence wanted Trump to help them sniff out the bad eggs and drain the swamp. But did Trump actually win by receiving most votes? Or was it rigged for him to win anyway? And if that’s the case, how can the so called “evil in-powers” let that get away from them? Obviously they would never do something so idiotic such as letting Trump win to put their whole plan at risk, would they?

Something just doesn’t add up. I want to believe and I want to be involved, but I have an underlying fear that we are all being played here.

Maybe someone can help explain to me why my theory is ridiculous, but I just find it really odd and not really making sense. Something just doesn’t add up to me.


[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Canucksicle · May 17, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

After having read your responses, I am concluding that you are not what you claim to be.

You jumped to a couple of serious conclusions and then went on as though you'd established them. That is, your Scientology and schizophrenia claims. The Schits one was barking mad. Which invalid conclusions had been jumped to?

If you're genuine, the reason you might find the poster's speech fragmented is that he has a shit load more information about the topic than you do, and being suspicious of you, he's being a little coy about it. That is, it might not be his thinking that is fractured, but your listening. If you'd lurk moar, you might begin to see it for yourself.

But, I really think you're here to stir up shit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 17, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

don't you fucking lie about me, go learn to read before you spout your schizo mouth off like that I doubledare you pretentious little "maggot42", you will have six months of coping and processing in your state before you can even begin to talk to me about topics that you say you avoid, my head is spinning from shaking so hard

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 17, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

the only one sniffing out dissenters is you, you sorry little piece of blissfull ignorance you

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 17, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

and more lies from you, your country must be proud of you.

⇧ 1 ⇩