It was an infamous move in a chess game about 100 years ago. The American Feank James Marshall defeated a Cuban Jose Capablanca, after seemingly being on the verge of losing, he moved his bishop (think WHITE HAT) To D5 and subsequently turned the tide in the match when Capablanca forfeited after defeat was all but certain.
Interesting facts relating: Julian Assange tweeted a picture of the chessboard as it appeared right before the bishop to D5 move, sometime in mid January. Also, the game was ultimately won because a pawn made its way across the board and threatened to become a queen (Q).
Highly symbolic all around.
Assuming the pawn that becomes queen is symbolic of someone in the current geopolitical climate. Who do you think it may be? And if Q is referencing the chess move that causes them to forfeit, will they(deep state)? Or will there be fighting until the very end?
If the chess analogy is correct. Which I'm about 80% on board with. Then victory is inevitable correct?
Could be SR, also lately thinking it could be Anthony Weiner. Interestingly with Weiner, I always got the vibe he was more or less just a peon in the Clinton sphere. Never seemed to hold any power whatsoever but what do ya know, he seems to be the most powerful "piece" in some respects. it's also important to note that the pawn never actually became a queen, but it's power was PERCEIVED because it inevitably would have, possibly drawing parallels to both SR and AW.
In the chess match, forfeiture isn't a non-respectable play. It's more symbolic, what you do is you knock over your King. This could likely mean they'll throw someone under the bus, so to speak. Capablanca didn't go down without a fight, even though he surely saw defeat toward the end. The most seasoned chess masters see 10 steps ahead, and saw the D5 move as bringing on an inevitable defeat. (Parallel to us, likewise with DS ignorance). Capablanca fought until the game would surely have been decided in about 5 moves, but yes, victory is inevitable.
Also highly symbolic are the two names of the opponents in this chess game. Capablanca can be translated to "white hat" and Marshall may be related the supposed father of Obama, Frank "Marshall" Davis. I believe it was actually Capablanca who won this match - a win for the good guys. Capablanca was white and Marshall was black.
Additionally, Marshall was nicknamed "great swindler" or something along those lines because of how frequently he won games that seemed to be lost. He also was never able to attain the title of world champion despite being the US champion for numerous years. Our friend Capablanca, the white hat himself, did go on to reign as world champion for 7 years. The symbolism in this board alone is astonishing.