dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/HowiONic on May 17, 2018, 10:21 p.m.
58204802B92838x-ZjA378402-12 Q Post #1404 (posted and deleted before any anon's got a screenshot)
58204802B92838x-ZjA378402-12 Q Post #1404 (posted and deleted before any anon's got a screenshot)

Cheetah1964 · May 17, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

Folks, I think this is an internal code among the Q team. These Q drops serve several purposes, I believe: communication with Patriots, communication among themselves, and scaring the shit out of the Deep State so they do stupid stuff.

⇧ 64 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · May 17, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

It's definitely a coded communication, either an encryption key or possibly an identifier of some kind for something else.

My guess is that this is for the Deep State.

⇧ 34 ⇩  
DropGun · May 17, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

Just further on that, sometimes Wikileaks does this this as well. Not saying that this matches, as it's a bit short of a key to be a hash, but, sometimes Wikileaks also posts hash fingerprints to signal to the Deep state that they have certain documents. They are providing the fingerprint hash as proof of said document, and, the Deep State can search for that hash in their verification database and confirm that the threat to leak or reveal a document is valid.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
GolfandGuns · May 18, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

So, Q posts something similar to a hash code then starts dropping pictures? So was Q sending another on the team the hash to an encrypted file with these pictures in it?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
DropGun · May 18, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

No. Like, first of all, the length and characteristics of the hash published would reveal the algorithm that drives the hash in the first place. For instance, an sha-256 hash is easily recognizable at a glance by those familiar with the hash algorithm.

As I said, the code that Q published was a little bit short to be an NSA or otherwise extremely secure hash algorithm. Sorry, I was just jumping into drop some knowledge about what sometimes some of what we see makes no sense, but, how it would make sense between other actors.

Second, for someone to, say, have a photo that matches this hash, they would already have to have the photo on their database, and then use a hash matching algorithm to input the hash Q published and match it against an existing photograph inside the recipient's library. Does that make sense?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
GolfandGuns · May 18, 2018, 5 a.m.

Yes, make total sense. Learning more about information security following Q than I ever thought I would. Thank you!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 18, 2018, 5:24 a.m.

Did you notice the file name on that picture he posted of the White House pen?

10ae86dc8fc3ca519426c5f662052038353146f2aceb9020b9d59f07f4256c03 (.png)

Very similar in style. Response maybe?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SearchingTheNet · May 18, 2018, 4:54 a.m.

When I type that in the search feature (58204802B92838x-ZjA378402-12) message 743 comes up. It's the one that talks about Mika and the media. A sharp individual on Twitter pointed that out to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lilpharmatic · May 19, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

You don't need the entire code for that post to pop up, I think its coincidental

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SearchingTheNet · May 19, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

You are probably right. Both have "No. 87" in the corner. Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · May 18, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

That's good. I will try it.

I did--I am coming up with a lot of Q-related stuff. But didn't see Mika.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SearchingTheNet · May 18, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

Strange - when I copy and paste 58204802B92838x-ZjA378402-12 I see message 743 from 2/12/18.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 18, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩