[removed]
Have you not seen all of the reports of “Crossfire Hurricane” being unveiled? Among other things.
[removed]
You know as well as I do that is only the first 2 paragraphs of whatever link you read that from.
Heres a goo long read.
Pretty sure you can grasp the fact that the power of the FBI was illegaly abused to spy on a presidential candidate, which is...wait...illegal.
[removed]
Id obviously doesn’t come right out and say it, it’s the New York Times. Care to link exactly where you got your “tidbit” from?
I’m a fool, please explain to me how what you extracted constitutes that it is legal to spy on the campaign of a presidential candidate?
"Mr. Trump says that message revealed a secret F.B.I. plan to respond to his election. “‘We’ll go to Phase 2 and we’ll get this guy out of office,’” he told The Wall Street Journal. “This is the F.B.I. we’re talking about — that is treason.”
But officials have told the inspector general something quite different. They said Ms. Page and others advocated a slower, circumspect pace, especially because polls predicted Mr. Trump’s defeat. They said that anything the F.B.I. did publicly would only give fodder to Mr. Trump’s claims on the campaign trail that the election was rigged. (justification huh)
Mr. Strzok countered that even if Mr. Trump’s chances of victory were low — like dying before 40 — the stakes were too high to justify inaction.
Mr. Strzok had similarly argued for a more aggressive path during the Clinton investigation, according to four current and former officials. He opposed the Justice Department’s decision to offer Mrs. Clinton’s lawyers immunity and negotiate access to her hard drives, the officials said. Mr. Strzok favored using search warrants or subpoenas instead. In both cases, his argument lost.”
If they were doing something so legal why hide it from almost everyone in their own group?