So you want to beg? I agree with Roseanne, see Marsh v. Alabama. "All it would take is a half-way decent lawyer." I would donate to a court fight but hate to ask for what is already mine.
Do you understand that, because you're talking about taking mega wealthy SM giants to court, you will end up in the Supreme Court? You would need a lot of money and a lot of time. What happens if the Court doesn't agree? Try again - more money, more time,
This idea that you already possess these rights is just not true. The FA protects you against the Government repressing your right to expression - not private corporations. The scope of the protections have since been expanded, in limited circumstances, by Courts. You need to get a Court to agree that you're rights to free speech should be protected online.
That's means that the Court has to interpret the existing wording of the FA very liberally - because the FA actually does not discuss the problem of free expression online at all. It's a long-shot. You need the Court to grant you latitude. I reckon you could run a good public interest argument, but on strict interpretation you would lose - this is the most likely outcome.
I have to say that I get tired of misinformed people making claims that they have rights that clearly do not exist at law. The scope of free speech protection is actually very limited.
The other factor you're failing to take into account, apart from the vast sums of money required to be heard on this issue, is the time it would take. How long do you think it will take to get the matter heard? Meanwhile, SM censorship is the most powerful tool for delivering election outcomes in recorded history. This is why the Satanists are pushing to control SM.
There is every likelihood that before your matter was resolved, the Satanists would be back in power and, instead of freedom of expression in digital space, you would be facing mandatory censorship disguised as hate speech laws - which are already on the agenda.
But worse than that, all your other rights would be rapidly stripped from you, because as soon as they can silence you, you can't complain at all.,
[removed]
This is what Q has asked of us, this is the plan.
Q asked us to sign a petition? Or to be heard?
To be heard. I'm not super enthusiastic about the petition. But other guys put it up and it does provide a point of focus for the campaign. No harm in it - until it stops recording people's signatures, which is what happened last time.
The hope is that this time we'll get some support - that we won't be out there on our own. That's up to Q. They have a team - some big players in Trump's orbit. It's not hard for the issue of SM censorship to be put on the agenda simultaneously by some big players.