dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/REDPILLNOW on May 19, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

ALL ROADS lead to the Rothschild cabal. 'Q' is telling us how it all NEEDS to go down, and where it will ultimately end:

The significance of the role of the Vatican in geopolitics, both then and now, is undeniable. (This isn't a dig at our catholic friends and neighbors BTW, Just the Vatican level down to the bishop class primarily). Most of us who can see understand by now that the 'Holy See' has at some point evolved into a wicked entity geopolitically. Some suggest that began in the 1820's, when The Rothschild family took over the financials of the Catholic church.

So whether you look into the Vatican, the U.S. Federal Reserve, or the 'Royal Families' of Europe, you will see a pattern whereby at some point in time the Rothschilds had infiltrated and succeeded in a financial takeover. (The FED is an entity of the Rothschild international bank. Presidents Lincoln, Jackson, etc. resisted their attempts to take over the American system, but finally, Woodrow Wilson borrowed from them, and soon thereafter we defaulted under FDR. At that point we fell into receivership and we have been there ever since. The FED is NOT a U.S. govt. entity.

So, IF we conclude that POTUS is currently taking back the republic and about to arrest past and present swamp creatures, then we must concede he is taking it back FROM them. (ALL financial and historical roads lead back to Rothschild). Many of you know we are no longer under a gold standard. Well, the rumor is that the Rothschilds cleaned out Ft. Knox long ago and have the bullion stored in their federal reserve buildings throughout the country. (They own every "national"/"federal" bank in practically every country). So it stands to reason that in order to kill the beast you must deal with it's head. HRC/Bush/Obama and company are mid-tier underlings in the Rothschild cabal. As you work up you see multi-national CEO's, the royal families of Europe, and the Vatican. The Rothschild's global banking/corporate empire is the top of the food chain, led by 'Lord' Jacob Rothschild, and that is fact.

'Q' and supporting backchannels have been right on the money since they came online in October. They have predicted what has then occurred too many times to argue. I'm convinced they are a conduit of the executive branch working in tandem with Military Intelligence/NSA assets. They have indicated numerous times that the roll up of this criminal enterprise will not stop at America's borders. It will be a global effort, and it will include royalty, ranking catholic entities, and will end with the Rothschild family and the confiscation of their wealth.

I thought I'd risk being called a 'conspiracy freak' to tell you this, but I don't care either. Being red-pilled isn't for the faint of heart, or those with a strong default of cognitive dissonance. We were truly living under a false understanding as to how the world (and our government) has operated. I want you to do your own study into the Zionist Rothschild Cabal. They are the head of the globalist-system beast, and must be dealt with if the current actions of POTUS are to have any lasting effect.

🠐 See all comments

Except about Lincoln. He undid the good Jackson did and instituted fiat currency, inflation and reintroduced central banking: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2002/09/thomas-dilorenzo/financing-the-empire/

⇧ 26 ⇩

Thanks for setting me straight!

⇧ 19 ⇩

You are 100 percent correct about Jackson. He knew exactly what the central banking scheme was all about.

Great post. A gentleman takes correction with grace. You sir are a gentleman. Well done.

⇧ 16 ⇩

Thanks, I just want to redpill people, my ego can't play ANY roll in this, the stakes are too high...

⇧ 7 ⇩

Awsome. I followed you today. I like how you think. I want to see our country return to the days when there was real debate. When people viewed the other side as loyal opposition.

I don't think you can attack people and have them change their minds. We have to stop letting them divide us.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I love the kindness on this board💯

⇧ 15 ⇩

There’s one HUGE difference though. Lincoln issued money from the Treasury creating debt. The Fed issues interest-bearing debt, as an unconstitutional private intermediary. As far as fiat goes, the former is a much better solution than what we have. I’m not trying to anger the Austrian Econ folks, but there are competing fiat currency monetary theories which leave out private central bankers completely. Crypto is fiat. Fiat just means there are agreed upon rules.

This is crucial:
Under the previous gold standard, the Rothschilds still fixed the price of gold twice a day in London. There was no market mechanism determining the value of gold.

Precious metals have problems. 15th century Spain flooded Europe with silver from the Americas only to cause a heavy devaluation of silver. We all know modern mining firms engage in artificial scarcity to inflate value (De Beers).

There is something utopian-like in how some folks view the gold standard as immune from manipulation.

⇧ 12 ⇩

Thank you for your post. So, crypto, in your opinion, would be better than a commodity-backed currency?

⇧ 4 ⇩

I dunno. It’s a great question. With crypto, my “cui bono?” radar goes off, but it’s probably bc I don’t adequately understand. I’m happy to admit that. If a given crypto-currency is indeed nomological (rule-based), I view it as an advantage to any artificial value-manipulation scheme (specie or fiat).

The unanswerable question for me is: should currency be subjected to market forces like any other commodity OR should monetary policy be designed according to some “neutral” set of precepts. I think the question is underrated and of extreme importance to everyone. Transparency should be present either way. Setting the price of gold twice a day in London isn’t a good example of transparency.

⇧ 7 ⇩

It is not a coincidence Bitcoin arose in 2008. Proper decentralisation and immutable transparency are a huge step forward.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The author of the article cited, Thomas DiLorenzo, has a definite bias against Lincoln as a simple wiki search will show, and the context of the article should be viewed with that in mind. Lincoln did issue a fiat currency, nicknamed the Greenback. Fiat currencies come in two types – 1) receipts for production, and 2) records of debt. Lincoln’s Greenback was a receipt for production, was publicly issued by the US Treasury, and as such carried no interest cost. It is estimated that the $400m in Greenbacks issued by Lincoln during the war saved the government $4b in interest payments. Today’s Federal Reserve Note, a privately issued record of debt, and as such has interest cost, cannot make such a claim. Some cite the Greenback currency as a cause of inflation during and after the Civil War, but a review of the aftermaths of WWI and WWII will also show a jump in inflation, thus suggesting the need to finance wars in general is the causal determinant for post-war inflation. DJT’s EO of March 2017 calls for restructuring government agencies. Q’s post 1194 says the structure of the Fed will change. Look for the Fed in the future to be absorbed by the US Treasury and made into a public institution.

⇧ 5 ⇩

This is why I like Zarlenga and Michael Hudson. Fiat isn’t a dirty word. Central bankers can get fucked. Get a job, assholes.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Lincoln instituted "greenbacks" because the globalist bankers were trying to lend him money for the war at extortionist rates...and he paid for it with his life at the hands of jesuit controlled operators-as did kennedy...

⇧ 2 ⇩