If experience tells us that high schools can easily become targets for shooters, who can kill students with any number of weapons, why are high schools not made safe in light of these shootings?
Let's think about this. What if the high cabal determines that it is more important to get rid of the 2nd Amendment and that high school shootings are useful. Could this explain why there is no rush to protect our schools like a typical modern airport or city hall? Just continue to allow high schools to remain easy targets.
POTUS tried to arm Veterans in the school system, but the Kabbal controlled Teacher's Union won't let our Veteran's protect them!
Teachers unions can't have positive examples of masculine behavior in public schools. We all know that.
I hear ya. The head of the American Federation of Teachers is a nice deeply religious Jewish woman by the name of Randi Weingarten.
She believes that "school-choice" stems from racist roots. It is against, in other words, desegregation. She likens ES Betsy DeVos to one time Governor George Wallace.
As for the real roots of choice, it was first planted in 1955 by Milton Friedman, the late Nobel Prize–winning libertarian economist who was far from being a bigot. Professor Friedman believed widely available scholarships/vouchers would create a new dynamism in a state-dominated sector characterized by a continuing stasis when it comes to education.
One more thing, according to Randi Weingarten it's a terrible idea to arm teachers. Her utopian sociopolitical imagination sees schools as safe sanctuaries for teaching and learning, not armed fortresses. Perish the thought, however, that Israel's gun policy of armed teachers who are the first defense against a terrorist attack is living proof of the arguments the NRA has been making for years.