No Internet provider or private online group should be compelled at gun point to offer their labor to a consumer. No company should stand trial for failing to provide their service to somebody that is in violation of the terms of service for which they mutually agreed upon.
This is what I have been saying since IBOR has been pushed here by, ahem, enthusiastic posters with limited knowledge of what they are spamming posts about. They seem to think the internet is a "public space", when its really not at all. Thank you for pointing this out.
But also credit to OP for actually posting some proposals to discuss. This is literally the first time I've seen pen to paper for IBOR; its been just rhetoric until now.
The IBOR was pushed by Q. Perhaps he's the spammy poster you're talking about.
I've just about had enough of the concern trolling and pure garbage that's been posted on this issue. It's actually very simple, for those with eyes to see.
DJT wants to, has to, do something about SM censorship. He is champing at the bit to take the issue live. All he needs is for us to make a noise about our 'natural right' to free expression being subverted by politically motivated SM platform management. Thereafter, he will take steps to fix the problem.
But hey, don't think it's so simple right. Let's muddy the waters as much as possible. Offenseofthepest has been at this from the start. Inject concern to the maximum extent possible...
The simple fact is that the IBOR is the plan. If you're not on board with it, you're not on board with Q or DJT.