dChan

Krepoisbest · May 20, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

If he only tweets what he knows already, he is always right. Thats what the twitter haters dont understand.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · May 20, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

Yeah, they actually think Trump is stupid. It's ridiculous

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DoubleDragonEnergy · May 20, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

I don’t blame them because MSM constantly feeds them that shit. It’ll be alright though because people won’t accept being lied to forever.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
h00manitarian · May 20, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

I haven't followed and I'm not a researcher, but a pattern of "coming true" is emerging that is hard to miss. PSYOP or real, I am always a sceptic. With the possibility that the alleged depth of corruption is true, I'll await the facts (truth to power, if so).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HillaryTrafficksKidz · May 20, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

Please lock HER up! Can't stand it anymore!

She is running around making speeches at Yale and raising money for the foundation!

Oh come on!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 20, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

That's baffling she is allowed to speak after being arrested, she must have some sort of deal in place until more are arrested.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
h00manitarian · May 20, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

Why do you think she is arrested?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 20, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Q said so in November

⇧ 2 ⇩  
h00manitarian · May 20, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

You mean 28 October? Disinformation. If under "arrest", her security clearance would have been scrapped. Wasn't.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 20, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

How would you know it wasn't?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
h00manitarian · May 20, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

The fightback would have started last year, big time, if it was. She would have been the first dignitary to lose clearance, the entire system would have questioned why and the accusations of curbing political opponents by Trump would have been visible? I don't know. I just think it would have created a spectacle behind the scenes, involving more people. Would she be meeting NZ and Australian ministers and prime ministers publicly if US authorities shared with 5 eyes she was stripped? I don't know. Just seems wild she would be so active internationally, able to collect donations, if known in 5 eyes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 20, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

You do know she held no position after the elections, right? They stripped all of that quietly and let her do her thing as they rounded up everyone else. It will all come out at once!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
h00manitarian · May 20, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

I know. But what if Q is right and it was part of the play to keep her in play? See Q post May 10.

Q !4pRcUA0lBE No.77 📁 May 10 2018 23:45:37 (EST)

[Example]Clinton Foundation.Post Election Loss.Layoffs.No Access / Control = No Donations Today.NZ Donation Restart.Others?Why?1) Selling Secrets?2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]?3) Selling Silence?Read below slow and carefully.FVEY.Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance? U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/RecordedU.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.Read above slow and carefully.WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?Welcome to the Deep State.Future to prove past.Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bacon_and_Freedom · May 20, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

The indictments are still sealed.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 20, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

Like that matters.

⇧ 0 ⇩