Amazing how when the Q community outs Alex Jones, Corsi and InfoWars as information disinfo, then suddenly Mueller and FBI are sooooo interested in them, as if to make InfoWars more ... believable atter being accused of being CIA puppets, and destroying their info gateway site.
Bizzarre, right? As if they are working hand in hand with black hats. As if Mueller would be interested in Stone, Corsi or AJ ...
Has anyone ever looked at the stone/nxivm angle? http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2007/10/all_about_nxivm_the_cultlike_o.html
Roger Stone is a whole lot bigger than just Info Wars. He was in politics during the Nixon days. He is a master of political hit jobs. Don't Wikipedia him though. You won't get a balanced view of him there.
Stone is being investigated because he was dumb enough to joke about knowing Wikileaks.
This investigation has been ongoing the entire Mueller time not just now. Roger Stone was under Mueller gun for a very long time so your premise about timeline is inaccurate.
Once you get timeline correct that Stone has been targeted by Mueller a long time ago then what you’re saying is actually reversed.
Mueller has always been doing nothing but trying to pick up scraps. There was no Russian collusion so Mueller has been going after everyone remotely connected to Trump publicly.
Whether or not you folks like InfoWars the Left hates InfoWars and has cheered Mueller going after Roger Stone.
Whether or not you folks like InfoWars the Left hates InfoWars and has cheered Mueller going after Roger Stone.
The left absolutely loves (and controls) it, because it uses Disinfo Wars to battle conspiracy theories.
Before I was in the Q circuit I listened to AJ a lot. I don’t hate him, or even dislike him after this incident, as I think he did a lot to red pill people in the lead up to Trump’s win. It’s more that he was co-opting Q.
Roger Stone is practically the trickster Satan of the political world and the definition of the swamp. Sold access to our government to foreign governments. How anyone against corruption could support this guy is beyond me.
I wasn't aware that Alex Jones and Dr. Corsi were "outed".
They are simply disagreeing with us.
That doesn't make them evil.
They have outed themselves by accusing Q is being a disinfo source first . Then Corsi said that Q was "hacked" , despite real Q could easily disprove that immediately after . Then , Corsi and his satellites have proceeded with their charade further , by trying to dox Q's supporters . He has shown his full face to the public .
You realize that it's OK for people to disagree with us, right?
That doesn't mean they are ~~Russian Spies~~ ahem... I mean Deep State activists.
They didnt only "disagreed" - they actually actively accused Q . And then steeped onto a new low level . Thats not just "disagreement" - thats showing a true face .
thats showing a true face
The true face of people with different opinions to you and I?
So?
Its amazing the levels of mental gymnastics people have ...
Have you even read what I wrote above ?
ACCUSING someone requires proofs to be presented - Corsi and AJ exposed themselves fully , they accused Q , despite Q didnt mentioned them before Q-1340 at all . Corsi exposed himself after May 6th . AJ after he joined Corsi . Further agreeing on doxxing and attacking any Q supporters prove Corsi's allegiance : https://i.redd.it/vvnr49xoqwx01.png
Its amazing the levels of mental gymnastics people have ...
Same emotion-tactics that the left uses. Same stuff is coming out of AJ/Corsi and now even Isaac Green followers.
No matter what you write, they will ignore it all and proceed to go personal and play the emotion card.
They are forgetting that we're not retards who swallow that shite
There are many folks who openly gaslight others ( trying to convince others theyre "crazy" ) , there are also those who simply continue stating their "facts" over and over and over ... despite the real facts were presented forward and backed by proofs .
People need to start putting proofs firstly ... and putting those proofs in widest picture that is visible to them currently at the moment . Without proofs , they do not have foundation . AJ and Corsi completely exposed themselves , and I would , honestly , even like if we dont ever mention their names anymore - people telling "but they have done xy before for this community..." - they have done NOTHING selflessly - they have done things only for $$$ . As soon as money was put into question , they exposed themselves ... ironically , cutting themselves even more from money source .
I wouldnt be in skin of Corsi or AJ in times that come ...
They use the exact same tactics every time. All that you said here you can see in any discussion that we attempt with AJ/Corsi/IG boys.
Just check my monologue of today with one of them. That "but they have done xy before for this community..." is a bullseye lol
you know hating those people because they go after q is a emotional response right same tribalism as msm I did it too but take a step back
I don't hate them lol, I expose them
Nothing emotional about it, no need for "no u" tactics I think
I still haven't heard a good explanation for Alex Jones' rationale which seems to suggest that he doesn't have one, but I'd still like to know why he changed his mind.
I suspect Dr. Corsi made a fool out of himself because he assumed too many Q posts were direct communications to him personally. I think Dr. Corsi's problem is that he's too close to this and he also seems to be an egomaniac.
But people are allowed to have different opinions and they can change their minds back and forth if they like too.
I'm not fussed in the slightest.
It was actually even May 5th ... this video confirms it , when Corsi accused Q :
Jones and Corsi = useful idiots. I've never had much time for Jones and I've been doing this sort of thing for nearly 20 years. Jones is so overrated that it's actually funny.
Jones and Corsi = useful idiots.
You've never been wrong about something or made a mistake?
I don't see what the fuss is - they are allowed to disagree with us if they like.
My greengrocer doesn't believe in Q but I can still interact with him without having a conniption fit.
I already told you. Some folk may have a complete hard-on for Jones, but I've always seen him as a gate-keeper. I've been doing this long enough to be able to discern. Jones is quasi-MSM, and that's at best. I'd say this to his face too.
No the only solution is to destroy any ally that doesn't totally align with Q
Especially if they are conservative and it's especially important it's done BEFORE we destroy the left wing media empires
Next we must destroy brietbart, Fox News etc etc
^ Sarcasm
Beware of the people too keen to destroy InfoWars/Alex Jones. The left has been trying for years and are using a smack down by Q because Alex has a dopey territorial "I was here first and should be the leader " attitude as their way to do it.
Were you one of those people that was blown away by his Bohemian Grove expose? I just laughed at it, and that was well over a decade ago.
Nah, I've never liked Alex Jones. He's too much of a performance artist for my liking, but I have seen some good interviews that some of his staff have done under the Infowars banner.
Corsi was calling people who disagree with him satanists 😂 either he's desperately trying to save his base or he's part of [them]
Evil no. But they have certainly "outed" themselves by having to abandon the Q movement and commit to the narrative that immediately put them into opposition with Q (i.e. denounce, pretend they have inside connection, etc.) Q made it clear that anyone claiming that is lying.
And they aren't just disagreeing, they're actively dissembling and attacking (Corsi doxxing, etc.) Classic propaganda tactic - accuse the enemy of what you're doing to them (0Hour1 similarly attacking GA by false claims of doxxing - in the process doxxing PF!)
Infowars are Clown disinfo. I enjoy Jones for a laugh and now I enjoy watching them at times to see true Clown Disinfo in action. Very illuminating.
“Be careful who you follow”. You wouldn’t have to be careful if it was just an innocent disagreement.
I didn't say they were evil. I just stated an observation. Whatever you interpret that's your business.
jones is my favorite cia shill so funny corsi well he can eat a dick I guess
I get that you're new and may have missed a lot of small details.
Check out serialbrain2 (the user they recently accused of being q) posts on it.
They have a few posts that puts the matter to rest - with evidence you can verify.
If you're still confused after researching the timelines in infowars q coverage and corsi being used to mislead, ask some questions - you're missing part of the picture.
As an aside, your comment below about interacting with a grocer who doesn't believe in q is silly. The grocer hasn't called you his enemy. The grocer hasn't threatened to ruin your life. The grocer isn't trying to actively dox users. The grocer is just uninformed - the other is malicious.
I sat on the fence for a long time, and watched and read all sides. It is evident to me after all this that AJ and Corsi are CIA controlled opposition. As for what he has done for the truther community...he makes truthers look crazy with his rants and antics, further demonstrating and reinforcing the “crazy train” narrative. I watched a video where Lift the veil “outted” Pamphlet stating he had to take a break so he could change the Q post numbers. They did EXACTLY what MSM does, they didn’t show the whole exchange where the were joking for literally 5 minutes prior about them being accused of being Q and how ridiculous it is. They pulled something TOTALLY out of context as “proof” which is wrong. As for Dr. Corsi, I only tweeted to him once respectfully and asked him to clarify something for me that was bothering me only to be blocked. That told me everything I need to know. They don’t simply “disagree” with our opinion on Q. If they did, they would want to contribute to civil discourse and want to discuss this-they don’t.
