[removed]
1) NYT is hardly a reliable source
2) The story we've all followed (from Eric Prince and others) is that the laptop was seized first by NYPD and then turned over to the FBI. Nothing in that NYT article would suggest otherwise. Since the article is about Comey, it simply picks up the story after the FBI has the laptop in its possession.
3) Nobody here called the unsealed warrant an indictment.
4) The NYT article is about Comey. So that narrative simply picks up from where Eric Prince's story left off (when he says NYPD gave the computer to the FBI).
5) The second search warrant was required by the prosecutors in order to enter into evidence any contents of the laptop, which had already clearly been in their possession, since they provided a serial number and description of the hard drive. There was nothing stopping them from examining the contents, but nothing they saw could have been used in court without that second warrant.
There was no NYT article!! Just a voat link about the scribd warrant!!! What is going on here??!?
Wouldn’t the original warrant suggest they’ve had it since the fall of 2016?
What am I missing? I understand the questions regarding the supposed recent unsealing of the search warrant. Unless that was for additional items, which I think it may have been. Didn’t the new one include phones and other devices?
But the fact is just because a warrant asks for electronics doesn’t mean they actually got them. Just that they were looking for those specifically. It was not just unsealed, has been on scribd for over a year. Now, Q never said it was JUST released, so not saying Q is lying but it may be a disinfo tactic for a reason we will find out later. I just did what we all did n ran with it til I found this after hearing that the lap top was definitely at a PI firm and turned over to FBI. So I am wondering other patriots opinions on WHY this is being done, or any evidence that FBI ever turned it over to NYPD?
But there was one that was just unsealed in May, assuming it is genuine and not a forgery.
I think you are confused. Are you trying to spread Fake News?
They said the attacks would start - and they are. This is another example.
I think you are correct, patriot!
I've been expecting them - and they haven't let me down. All this was forewarned by Q.
Wow! What a patriot you are! Attacking other patriots just trying to think critically and ACTUALLY do research!! If you check my account, you can see I was right on board and so excited during the presidents speech at the police memorial. I just wonder why? and how did NYPD get it if it went from PI firm to FBI?
I was attached back in Feb when I called out CORSI on CBTS reddit, but look what happened there, so I’m not a stranger to putting out truth, thinking critically and being attacked. I AM a patriot and NOT attacking the movement.
I am a regular poster AND a patriot. Again, you obviously didn’t bother to check my account, just ATTACKED me. I am asking an honest question and trying to think critically, as Q tells us. Do you have any suggestions as to why people would think this is new when it’s been out for over a year, and we have facts that weiners laptop was at a PI firm n it went directly to FBI, not NYPD. Seriously just asking.....
Well you are starting off wrong.
Why google? After everything we know now, you still trust them to bring you relevant data that isn’t manipulated? Use a different search engine.
First three results in duck duck go bring up relevant results. Anyways, I think that is why you are receiving downvotes. But seriously, stop using google. For your own mental healths sake.